X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:57:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm30-vm3.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.160] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with SMTP id 5577603 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:26:56 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.91.160; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: from [98.138.90.55] by nm30.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2012 12:26:20 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.171] by tm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2012 12:26:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jun 2012 12:26:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 792903.42537.bm@omp1027.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 52262 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2012 12:26:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:References:From:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version; b=YH46hFkObOG98yocWHb+htx5GAC2nTgBD56sil0WVLFaTIwcuZl5iPpZRBOs8TN5iqWNVhRBFBmes3j3+HOsJ5O4j+fTkKpRgXsLddEt2UFSuBY3Rv65BTw0vmOHUCCAtJjeIROstCWmmgSr8J7vZSpfi4ZePNbppIcE5D3OIpI= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: IvdF1agVM1kP4pl7r_XEq9y6GUrc0yMuzt6MBePzoh37ndf SLmVMK91uOFQpzAFvP6YdvithOdqHB2Q7vVQW5.mG2n00TRAHWc0SBlFSxU3 lzdGk_Of02wbMkjaNR.n67fSYZYHjR_WAiNKjMpuE_H7MYNA11mkcsAY4Nbc 1jeSNrLAgbMO._hns7XqB_QXOuOAS6f2YsVEqgUson8sP4R6GOOtZs47VG97 t.X6IDIxz2EyWf6Hys3DmtTPFAh42QOfOYL8..xacOfA2oUUaGDD6vHMh5Rz bdbC4BBHiE3309bmLCCOyaWzNQuWlRgYSIJkgOaaMUrCjdZcP.U2zfFYQ0ne YAV60ajKxhScIVbLhbwdYu77ZcFFKdnLdSvQHMBwfif7_SP2mkJuteJdepTT unHlHddQ4YQKaUJLpQq1fn.Q36NUyq0pJl3QgleV6UNSUlg-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: tg4YEXeswBAq79ZTs5A79J5zDY9lAVNV Received: from [192.168.1.103] (randylsnarr@76.8.220.20 with xymcookie) by smtp112-mob.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Jun 2012 12:26:19 +0000 UTC Subject: Re: [LML] Hydraulic vs. electric CS props References: From: Randylsnarr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1571EFE2-303F-441F-943A-AAA1FA39738E X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A334) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 06:26:19 -0600 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-1571EFE2-303F-441F-943A-AAA1FA39738E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii The hydraulic propellers change pitch faster. This is not a big deal once yo= u get used to this. I run the 3 blade mt electric and love it. It is the smo= othest most efficient propeller I have ever flown behind. very light as wel= l , only 37 lbs... Randy Snarr N694RS 235/320 Sent from my iPad On Jun 1, 2012, at 2:30 PM, "Gary Fitzgerald" wrote: > Is there an advantage to using a hydraulic CS prop over an electric one? D= oes anybody out have experience with the MT 3-blade electric prop? > =20 > Gary Fitzgerald > LNC2 ~70% > St. Charles, MO > (Still) Looking for a good deal on > a used or rebuildable (I)O-360 > =20 > =20 > =20 > =20 --Apple-Mail-1571EFE2-303F-441F-943A-AAA1FA39738E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

The hydraulic propellers change pitch faster. This is not a big deal once you get used to this. I run the 3 blade mt electric and love it. It is the smoothest most efficient propeller I have ever flown behind. very light as well , only 37 lbs...

Randy Snarr

N694RS

235/320

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 1, 2012, at 2:30 PM, "Gary Fitzgerald" <gbfitz@swbell.net> wrote:

Is there an advantage to using a hydraulic CS prop over an electric one? Does anybody out have experience with the MT 3-blade electric prop?

Gary Fitzgerald
LNC2 ~70%
St. Charles, MO
(Still) Looking for a good deal on
a used or rebuildable (I)O-360

--Apple-Mail-1571EFE2-303F-441F-943A-AAA1FA39738E--