Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #62235
From: Steve Colwell <mcmess1919@yahoo.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Cooling Shroud
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 07:54:17 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
[LML] Cooling Shroud

John,

 

Funny you would ask.  I had lunch with Chris Zavatson today.  He mentioned that flow thru the inlets is not laminar due to prop turbulence.  I was told it was supposed to be laminar by an engineer who should have known.  Maybe it would be without prop interference.

 

Steve Colwell

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of John Cox
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 10:30 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Cooling Shroud

 

Steve can you illuminate who determined the internal airfoil was "optimized for laminar flow".  I have been fascinated with Bowers Induction and properly sized plenum openings.

 

John Cox

 


From: Lancair Mailing List on behalf of Steve Colwell
Sent: Fri 6/1/2012 11:12 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Cooling Shroud

Gene,

My hangar-mate developed the production version of this aluminum inlet back
in the 1990's and sold it to James.  http://www.romeolima.com/RV8/Cowl.htm
As you can see, it is captured by the upper and lower cowls and connected to
the plenum with sections of tire tube.  The inside is an airfoil optimized
for laminar flow. 

Steve Colwell 



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster