Return-Path: Received: from hil-img-9.compuserve.com ([149.174.177.139]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA12560 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:22:14 -0400 Received: (from root@localhost) by hil-img-9.compuserve.com (8.8.6/8.8.6/2.14) id MAA25854 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:22:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:21:48 -0400 From: "Dane L. White" Subject: LIV-P fast build? Sender: "Dane L. White" To: Lancair List Message-ID: <199809221222_MC2-5A43-7764@compuserve.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hello all, I'm building a LIV-P and am approaching decision time on the fuselage kit. I got the fast build "B" kit (wings & tail) primarily because I've never built a composite wing and I wanted to buy their expertise on such critical structural components. I'm having second thoughts, though, on paying an extra $9000 for the quick build fuselage. Are Lancair's advertised time savings accurate? Do they do any critical assembly that would otherwise require me to invest in extra, expensive tools? Are there any pitfalls to buying the quick build vs. the standard kit? If you've built, or are building a LIV-P, either slow or fast build, please take a moment and tell me if you're happy with your decision regarding the fast vs. slow build fuselage. Thanks! Dane White Murfreesboro TN