X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:58:14 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with ESMTP id 5559748 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:08:59 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.40; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.140]) by imr-ma02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q4PE8GJ3011489 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:08:16 -0400 Received: from core-mte005b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mte005.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.236.81]) by mtaomg-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 675F0E00008A for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 10:08:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1ebf0.3c51ddbd.3cf0ec4f@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 10:08:16 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [LML] loctite X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_1ebf0.3c51ddbd.3cf0ec4f_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 168 X-Originating-IP: [67.175.156.123] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:479072320:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338c4fbf92500e67 --part1_1ebf0.3c51ddbd.3cf0ec4f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Poke around here: _http://www.henkelna.com/industrial/thread-sealant-thread-sealing-loctite-an aerobics-14405.htm_ (http://www.henkelna.com/industrial/thread-sealant-thread-sealing-loctite-anaerobics-14405.htm) In a message dated 5/25/2012 9:00:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time, larry.eversmeyer@faa.gov writes: I've been reading the threads using different lubricant on fittings. I've read where loctite 567 & 565 are being used. Does anyone know the difference / or advantages between these two. Legacy still building Larry Eversmeyer --part1_1ebf0.3c51ddbd.3cf0ec4f_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Poke around here:

http://www.henkelna.com/industrial/thread-seala= nt-thread-sealing-loctite-anaerobics-14405.htm

In a message dated 5/25/2012 9:00:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 larry.eversmeyer@faa.gov writes:

=
I've been reading the t= hreads=20 using different lubricant on fittings. I've read where loctit= e 567=20 & 565 are being used. Does anyone know the difference / or=20 advantages between these two.

Legacy still building
Larry=20 Eversmeyer

--part1_1ebf0.3c51ddbd.3cf0ec4f_boundary--