Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #62072
From: <Sky2high@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Instrument Panel comments/advice requested
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:01:10 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Doug,
 
Why I have two panel mounted comms:
 
Early in my instrument rating training (in a twin) and on my fifth approach into a Class C airport, I became mentally overloaded.  That means that the brain didn't just slow down, it stopped!  The overload came from getting plates, remembering where, who and what to call in, tuning radios to different frequencies, etc. etc.  The lesson I learned was to get all simple workload items done as early as possible to avoid having to do a bunch of stuff with not enough time.
 
Two comms make any C/D airport approach, in VFR or IFR, a piece of cake.  At least 20 miles out, I will have tuned ATIS, Approach control (if any), tower and ground into the two radios (active and tuning displays).  A frequency switch is just a single pushbutton away or comm switch.  Oh, and one radio is a backup for the other should there be a failure.
 
Scott Krueger
 
PS Fancy avionics are fine if you can remember how to work them when you need to....... Practice, Practice, Practice.
 
In a message dated 5/13/2012 5:51:46 P.M. Central Daylight Time, lancairav8r@gmail.com writes:
My apologies to everyone for forgetting to include what I am building in my original message. My project is a Lancair 360 with a custom engine from Aero Sport power, 4 into one custom exhaust, forward hinge canopy, outback gear. The MVP-50P I mentioned was purchased a few years ago and I think it's a great product. If I didn't already have it I'd likely do a combined PFD and EMS but as it stands now my MVP be a stand alone EMS. Only downside is the extra real estate used on the panel but even with thew small 360 panel I don't think it will be overcrowded.

I have received a lot of great advice both privately and through the list and I thank you all very much. I am now comparing and analyzing the Advanced Flight Systems EFIS and the GRT product. Though my IFR flying will be limited I absolutely agree it's either an IFR bird or it's not. Mine will be IFR capable with appropriate backups so I definitely want reliable, stable and proven technology.

Thanks for all the great input. I am envious of all you flyers out there and hope to be joining your ranks someday soon!!

Doug

Doug Waddingham
Centennial, CO
N521DW
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster