X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:21:11 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPS id 5490329 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:22:36 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.217.180; envelope-from=doramsey@gmail.com Received: by lbbgi4 with SMTP id gi4so1411439lbb.25 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:21:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.109 with SMTP id gd13mr5806614lab.9.1334924518236; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.99.162 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 05:21:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 08:21:57 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Fuel Tank Calibration Followup From: Dennis Ramsey X-Original-To: Lml Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040715d7b6231e04be1b55bc --f46d040715d7b6231e04be1b55bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks to all who responded both on the LML and privately. In the end I had an issue with incorrect pinnout on a DSUB for the right wing input. When I discovered that problem (after two days of troubleshooting and testing wires) and corrected the pinnout and drawings, the problem went away. And for the record the system easily recognizes one gallon of fuel ( I have the Garmin G3X). I have an old kit so the probes are the 8 foot probes originating at the wing root. I am very pleased with the probe overall. I added a gallon at a time to the wings and got a good detection of each gallon up until about 39 gallons in my 40 gallon wings. I have heard stories of high quantities of unusable fuel in these birds. Granted this is not a completely valid test because it is not simulating the backpressure of the engine, but the pump loss of flow coincided with the fuel level reading zero gallons. I would be interested if others had experienced similar results. I am curious as to what the real world experience has been on unusable fuel and how you tested it. Thanks again! Dennis --f46d040715d7b6231e04be1b55bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks to all who responded both on the LML and privately.=A0 In the e= nd I had an issue with incorrect pinnout on a DSUB for the right wing input= .=A0 When I discovered=A0 that problem (after two days of troubleshooting a= nd testing wires) and corrected the pinnout and drawings, the problem went = away.=A0 And for the record the system easily recognizes one gallon of fuel= ( I have the Garmin G3X). =A0=A0I have an old kit so the probes are the 8 = foot probes originating at the wing root.=A0=A0 I am very pleased with the = probe overall.=A0 I added a gallon at a time to the wings and got=A0 a good= detection of each gallon up until about 39 gallons in my 40 gallon wings.= =A0=A0 I have heard stories of high quantities of unusable fuel in these bi= rds.=A0=A0 Granted this is not a completely valid test because it is not si= mulating the backpressure of the engine, but the pump loss of flow coincide= d with the fuel level reading zero gallons.=A0=A0=A0 I would be interested = if others had experienced similar results.=A0=A0 I am curious as to what th= e real world experience has been on unusable fuel and how you tested it.=A0=
=A0
Thanks again!=A0=A0 Dennis=A0
--f46d040715d7b6231e04be1b55bc--