X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:13:56 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTP id 5481193 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:27:15 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.207.164; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.139]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q3EBQbD1017981 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:26:37 -0400 Received: from core-mtb005a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mtb005.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.234.209]) by mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 66C4CE000082 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:26:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <39b34.7cddefe5.3cbab8ed@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [LML] Hartzell prop shim on Legacy X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_39b34.7cddefe5.3cbab8ed_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 168 X-Originating-IP: [67.175.156.123] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:406056064:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338b4f895eed5c18 --part1_39b34.7cddefe5.3cbab8ed_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Paul, You could consider a plate between the crankshaft flange and the prop. However, that might change the dynamic vibration and its harmonics? Seek advice from Hartzell. Can the rear of the spinner be shaved without reducing structural integrity? Scott Krueger In a message dated 4/13/2012 11:02:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time, pjdmiller@gmail.com writes: I'm running out of options for a little extra clearance between the front of the cowl and the prop spinner. Is there any way to add shims to a Hartzell prop on the IO-550 to extend the clearance? Paul Spruce Creek Legacy RG -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --part1_39b34.7cddefe5.3cbab8ed_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Paul,

You could consider a plate between the crankshaft flange and the=20 prop. However, that might change the dynamic vibration and its=20 harmonics? Seek advice from Hartzell.

Can the rear of the spinner be shaved without reducing structural=20 integrity?

Scott Krueger

In a message dated 4/13/2012 11:02:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 pjdmiller@gmail.com writes:

= I'm=20 running out of options for a little extra clearance between the front of = the=20 cowl and the prop spinner. Is there any way to add shims to a= =20 Hartzell prop on the IO-550 to extend the clearance?

Paul
Spru= ce=20 Creek
Legacy RG
--
For archives and unsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html<= /DIV> --part1_39b34.7cddefe5.3cbab8ed_boundary--