X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 06:26:16 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm38-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([72.30.239.16] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with SMTP id 5348262 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:29:35 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=72.30.239.16; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.215.142] by nm38.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2012 00:29:02 -0000 Received: from [98.139.215.252] by tm13.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2012 00:29:02 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1065.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Jan 2012 00:29:02 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 53112.88469.bm@omp1065.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 34225 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2012 00:29:02 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Subject:References:From:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version; b=yrxh0iV9gHBVUMWNt2DpgpmMGVM5M39BJtYYlSsu62lYLmgW3ZiVI4JCNy/X+BAMln1/iKBCf0i0ex/DYE/Sk4B+mXqeOzHTblNcXhZRoGSKTPJe8maEVrHvKCjOmD8i/6a9tPMyKxX5M7VgBYjvRWwzteP88EUs2bhFMIaBu18= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: mXgZPwgVM1mzS.1xuKJMVNmRK2Z6VboO18SX7gcKiJ6w3F4 phjbidHJwRoQ2p0cPfwLWlsA0JJDW2xa1GoB2aeOJRLVTdscChs7RRm1M.L9 lnZyR3ZkHdwrBL92_bSWaydz1Bs5VlOJ.oaMqmvKE3GsCathhXLywnRUn0Rs bikRKkXYMfUsKgOVlymzLQP6Axd1RN.es4h8Hs52F9qqG1U.yOaIhZH1tolg KJLrtA6qqMOoXT8SBzIN3tU9a6FHkGHA6pceLzCYGBCj75QflTp6vijvDBjD CXX_n_w9GcVYuCeSShXsycWpUp5OwJt6f1_D2oLneWx7N4RIKPYHavV.jqPY cLy1jdM9sLia1FFyfZOBRuqaZAaUi4biMpENFJhKFhOERLLsQH_T8u_CP0.Z oJEW84TBXf9VHb80gCT3Uux.bA1Wm0T.kGypvclcXxMuqS.f0.KCUJZQ- X-Yahoo-SMTP: tg4YEXeswBAq79ZTs5A79J5zDY9lAVNV Received: from [192.168.1.106] (randylsnarr@76.8.220.20 with xymcookie) by smtp105-mob.biz.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2012 16:29:01 -0800 PST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Ceramic exhaust coatings References: From: Randy Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-CC5E0F2D-80C1-4692-9CD1-05CDFF8F0C0F X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A334) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:28:59 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-CC5E0F2D-80C1-4692-9CD1-05CDFF8F0C0F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii One other thought, I have heard both sides of this argument before as well. I= also heard it is nearly impossible to weld / repair pipes with this coating= . I found a solution that solved the problem cheaply without making the pipe= s more difficult to weld. I wrapped my entire exhaust system with hot rod ex= haust wrap. I bought it at the local auto parts store in the 1" width. Spruc= e sells it as well. I tested the stuff with a torch in the hangar on my hand= and was amazed how well it insulates. I have 2 layers in some very hot plac= es on the pipes. In addition to reducing the inner cowl temps, It also tames= the vibration of the pipes and reduces noise.=20 Cheap, relatively light and effective... Fwiw. Randy Snarr N694RS 235/320 Sent from my iPad On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Colyn Case wrote: > I think it is about radiation. The reason I did it was to reduce the amo= unt of heat radiated back at the cylinder heads. While a shiny reflector m= ight be more effective in theory, installing it everywhere you would want it= on a TSIO550 exhaust system is a lot of work. =20 >=20 >=20 > On Jan 12, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Gary Casey wrote: >=20 > I guess I'm just not convinced about the effectiveness of typical ceramic c= oatings. =46rom what I can find out they are typically .001 to .002 thick, a= bout 5% of the thickness of the metal. In order to significantly reduce the= heat transfer compared to the metal, they would have to have thermal conduc= tivity in that order compared to steel. I can't find out what material is u= sed, but some might use zirconia, a very good insulator, which has about 10 t= o 20% of the conductivity of steel. But that's not the whole story. Inside= the pipe is a gas at perhaps 1500F moving at a relatively high velocity. T= he conductivity to the metal is therefore relatively good, resulting in a me= tal temperature of probably 1200F. The air on the outside is at about 180F a= nd it is moving slowly, so the heat transfer from the pipe to the air is "po= or." My guess is that the surface temperature of the ceramic is going to be= very close to what the metal would be without the coating. There just isn'= t enough thickness for it to be well insulated. Swain Technologies has a pr= oprietary process that puts .015 thickness on metal and that would probably w= ork. A big factor in heat transfer is radiation and the best way to reduce t= hat is with a shiny metal surface spaced away from the exhaust pipe, or from= the device to be protected. >=20 > Maybe ceramic coatings work well, but I'm afraid I'm not convinced. >=20 > Gary Casey > ES 157 >=20 --Apple-Mail-CC5E0F2D-80C1-4692-9CD1-05CDFF8F0C0F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
One other thought, I have h= eard both sides of this argument before as well. I also heard it is nearly i= mpossible to weld / repair pipes with this coating. I found a solution that s= olved the problem cheaply without making the pipes more difficult to weld. I= wrapped my entire exhaust system with hot rod exhaust wrap. I bought it at t= he local auto parts store in the 1" width. Spruce sells it as well. I tested= the stuff with a torch in the hangar on my hand and was amazed how well it i= nsulates. I have 2 layers in some very hot places on the pipes. In addition t= o reducing the inner cowl temps, It also tames the vibration of the pipes an= d reduces noise. 
Cheap, relatively light and effective...
Fwiw.

Randy Snarr
N694RS
235/320

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 12, 2012, at 1= :41 PM, Colyn Case <colyncase@= earthlink.net> wrote:

I think it is about radiation.   The reason I did it was to red= uce the amount of heat radiated back at the cylinder heads.   While a s= hiny  reflector might be more effective in theory, installing it everyw= here you would want it on a TSIO550  exhaust system is a lot of work. &= nbsp; 


On Jan 12, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Ga= ry Casey wrote:

I guess I'm just not convinced about t= he effectiveness of typical ceramic coatings.  =46rom what I can find o= ut they are typically .001 to .002 thick, about 5% of the thickness of the m= etal.  In order to significantly reduce the heat transfer compared to t= he metal, they would have to have thermal conductivity in that order compare= d to steel.  I can't find out what material is used, but some might use= zirconia, a very good insulator, which has about 10 to 20% of the conductiv= ity of steel.  But that's not the whole story.  Inside the pipe is= a gas at perhaps 1500F moving at a relatively high velocity.  The cond= uctivity to the metal is therefore relatively good, resulting in a metal tem= perature of probably 1200F.  The air on the outside is at about 180F an= d it is moving slowly, so the heat transfer from the pipe to the air is "poor."  My guess is that the sur= face temperature of the ceramic is going to be very close to what the metal w= ould be without the coating.  There just isn't enough thickness for it t= o be well insulated.  Swain Technologies has a proprietary process that= puts .015 thickness on metal and that would probably work.  A big fact= or in heat transfer is radiation and the best way to reduce that is with a s= hiny metal surface spaced away from the exhaust pipe, or from the device to b= e protected.

Maybe ceramic coatings work well, but I= 'm afraid I'm not convinced.

Gary Casey
E= S 157

= --Apple-Mail-CC5E0F2D-80C1-4692-9CD1-05CDFF8F0C0F--