X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:46:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with SMTP id 5347407 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:42:12 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.90.70; envelope-from=casey.gary@yahoo.com Received: from [98.138.90.54] by nm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2012 13:41:39 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.167] by tm7.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2012 13:41:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Jan 2012 13:41:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 899464.72769.bm@omp1023.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 74834 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2012 13:41:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=L/Jw8FhsRAx2AbHbD9JEA+Q7fVEj0CxXXVbuAn5kY3akt9+tLHcjoLljBLwshZksVpioFNrXa6gQloN5aQXuaSWFbZQftG7Ndpyn+3MW0DGr4WUBhu2hRxhpxPkWeYKQH7a8d3wWbkH8GeOZzVNd7PHT7IKyWUIwIRMCaU3PzLk=; X-YMail-OSG: c93cfMsVM1n5VIg4oNjPf5cerE8d8dkohlDml7UdyVOUgTd weRHxQltBQjZ2cXyiPF94X4RQnCRCaHOfzhL.Zv8RGiAx.tjx7tQM2XqJ60b Uw3uxV1NJJ5RQ_cPMBWyCCeDPXCb0cPm5pETXcZnpgUSKFs.dAq7QKkdbij3 BOXWHV9HVHNq0aZUWzpj7oMshiT9J5P3DPQYXJ0UsGfSnooChaLUbOheVIea CW_tGTnVAAHeRJmctWfniCHubxPRPqq1h6SYZNLDcDZU2kidqFan2baI7zOb _iYDjjWp.aG3oIMKLaWY8GX8Yucj2cmhHfwdOxKurGaW3EwWqc8z.yn8ZM0P ZB84DtMRI66U8.kV9QeYb41Mxq18ROr47YvmlOa5_zOj2BMtP.rnq.LvuxuJ AoDaXzHhwFBBQIarFG7vfAHGAQezixRf_YWH7vO8i Received: from [97.122.157.197] by web125602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:41:38 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 References: X-Original-Message-ID: <1326375698.74756.YahooMailNeo@web125602.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:41:38 -0800 (PST) From: Gary Casey Reply-To: Gary Casey Subject: Re: Ceramic exhaust coatings X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1088529044-2061985387-1326375698=:74756" ---1088529044-2061985387-1326375698=:74756 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I guess I'm just not convinced about the effectiveness of typical ceramic c= oatings. =A0From what I can find out they are typically .001 to .002 thick,= about 5% of the thickness of the metal. =A0In order to significantly reduc= e the heat transfer compared to the metal, they would have to have thermal = conductivity in that order compared to steel. =A0I can't find out what mate= rial is used, but some might use zirconia, a very good insulator, which has= about 10 to 20% of the conductivity of steel. =A0But that's not the whole = story. =A0Inside the pipe is a gas at perhaps 1500F moving at a relatively = high velocity. =A0The conductivity to the metal is therefore relatively goo= d, resulting in a metal temperature of probably 1200F. =A0The air on the ou= tside is at about 180F and it is moving slowly, so the heat transfer from t= he pipe to the air is "poor." =A0My guess is that the surface temperature o= f the ceramic is going to be very close to what the metal would be without the coating. =A0There just isn't enough thickness for it to be well insula= ted. =A0Swain Technologies has a proprietary process that puts .015 thickne= ss on metal and that would probably work. =A0A big factor in heat transfer = is radiation and the best way to reduce that is with a shiny metal surface = spaced away from the exhaust pipe, or from the device to be protected.=0A= =0AMaybe ceramic coatings work well, but I'm afraid I'm not convinced.=0A= =0AGary Casey=0AES 157 ---1088529044-2061985387-1326375698=:74756 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I guess I'm ju= st not convinced about the effectiveness of typical ceramic coatings.  = ;From what I can find out they are typically .001 to .002 thick, about 5% o= f the thickness of the metal.  In order to significantly reduce the he= at transfer compared to the metal, they would have to have thermal conducti= vity in that order compared to steel.  I can't find out what material = is used, but some might use zirconia, a very good insulator, which has abou= t 10 to 20% of the conductivity of steel.  But that's not the whole st= ory.  Inside the pipe is a gas at perhaps 1500F moving at a relatively= high velocity.  The conductivity to the metal is therefore relatively= good, resulting in a metal temperature of probably 1200F.  The air on= the outside is at about 180F and it is moving slowly, so the heat transfer from the pipe to the air is "poor."  My guess is that the su= rface temperature of the ceramic is going to be very close to what the meta= l would be without the coating.  There just isn't enough thickness for= it to be well insulated.  Swain Technologies has a proprietary proces= s that puts .015 thickness on metal and that would probably work.  A b= ig factor in heat transfer is radiation and the best way to reduce that is = with a shiny metal surface spaced away from the exhaust pipe, or from the d= evice to be protected.

Maybe ceramic coatings work= well, but I'm afraid I'm not convinced.

Gary Case= y
ES 157
---1088529044-2061985387-1326375698=:74756--