X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 16:58:44 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.grobsystems.com ([74.218.59.19] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with ESMTP id 5338990 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:09:27 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.218.59.19; envelope-from=btv1==35164e2288c==bronnenmeier@grobsystems.com X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1325790524-319d3c6b0001-yPXFKn Received: from bluexch01.grob.local ([10.10.0.103]) by mail.grobsystems.com with ESMTP id VA3X979A2pkZJFa0; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:08:44 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bronnenmeier@GROBSYSTEMS.COM X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CCCBDD.715671C0" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Subject: RE: [LML] 4P com issues X-Original-Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:08:43 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [LML] 4P com issues X-Original-Message-ID: <03E004EAF5B4DC4186EDF0995C9FE571B81D1B@bluexch01.grob.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] 4P com issues Thread-Index: AczL3QBz02HjMWYeRWS1djiJlTF4Ag== From: X-Original-To: , X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[10.10.0.103] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1325790524 X-Barracuda-URL: http://74.218.59.19:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at grobsystems.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CCCBDD.715671C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Colyn, Thank you for this helpful information - I let you know what happens with my installation Ralf=20 =20 From: Colyn Case [mailto:colyncase@earthlink.net]=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 4:38 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] 4P com issues =20 Ralf, =20 That sounds like a good plan. I'm no antenna expert but I did accumulate a few data points that I think might be beneficial to the group: =20 - define "good". Good is it works if you have line of sight to the transmitting station. e.g. 100 miles at altitude. my cessna installation is not "good". - I also have a Bob Archer in my tail. From talking to several, if you have an excellent installation you'll get 40+ miles range out of that but there's a null directly in front of and behind the airplane. Bob Archer himself admits the null issue. As long as you never fly direct-to you might be happy with that. - Belly installation works best on a IV. Ideally you want a 22" radius ground plane although slightly less seems to work. - Tim Ong did some tests that showed on a carbon airplane you'll do somewhat better with the ground plane OUTSIDE the skin. - Bob Pastusek has a belly whip mounted slightly behind the front of the gear doors with an 18" internal aluminum ground plane connected to an SL30. His reception is "good" by above definition. - I had a similar installation connected to a gns530W. My reception had some prominent nulls. I installed an external ground plane. We'll see what happens. - connectors have some signal loss. Diplexors have significant signal loss. Switches have some signal loss. I think I read somewhere on Bob Archer's web page that the loss from a diplexor is about a 50% reduction in range. - Get Jim Weir's RST-8020 antenna installation book. Even if you don't build your own antenna, it's really good basic easy to understand theoretical background that will improve whatever you do. It's available here as part of his kit for $29. http://www.rst-engr.com/rst/catalog/airplane_antenna.html He may be willing to sell just the book for $10 and he may be willing to email you the .pdf . Mail order from Jim may take a few weeks. - somebody asked about using a nav antenna for a com antenna. The antenna length is optimized for the wavelength used. e.g. a com antenna should have a vswr of around 1.0 at the middle of the com frequency range. com signals are vertically polarized. nav signals are horizontally polarized. A com monopole needs a good ground plane. You could put one sticking up or down out of a wingtip if you provided the ground plane in the wingtip surface. =20 =20 All that said, if I had it to do over again, this is what my IVP com installation would look like: - Com 1 antenna as far forward on the belly as I could get 18" radius. Wire directly to the radio with only the one connector at the radio. - use a commercial whip with the lowest vswr I can find. - lay in an external copper tape 8-pointed ground plane (like an asterisk) and connect it all with conductive paint. Conductive paint alone works great but there's some belief that it develops fissures over time so the copper tape makes a more reliable system. - Com 2 also on the belly 36" or more back. take what I can get for ground plane. The rationale is it's better than a portable whip and probably good enough for ground ops. (If I had a fiberglas airplane I would put it the other way up in the baggage compartment) - Com 2 wiring includes 2 connectors: 1 at radio and one accessible that I can disconnect and plug in my portable. This is bad for com 2 but more reliable than a diplexor and more optimal for the portable. =20 Colyn =20 On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:03 PM, wrote: Dear subscribers, =20 My com radio is not working as it should. In some areas it is working perfect. In other areas it does not work well. It seems to be worse at high altitude/high speeds and along the shore lines or over the great lakes. It is possible that I can barely read the controller and 20 miles further it is decent. On the ground or around an airport it always works ok. Sometimes I get a lot of static noise (depending on the airport). Sometimes the controller sounds like he would talk out of an helicopter. I am using the bose head sets. =20 I have metallic paint. I got static wicks - all grounded well. I got a Garmin GNS530W, a Garmin GNC250XL and a Garmin GMA340 Com Panel (see pic) =20 I got the following antennas: - VOR (in the fiberglass wing tip internally) - never had an issue - transponder (wing root externally) - never had an issue - marker (externally under the 0 of the N# - see pic) - never had an issue - GPS1 (internally in vertical stab. ) works ok - if I do two rolls in a row the GPS loses signal - other than that no issues - GPS2 (internally in vertical stab.) works fine - COM (internally in vertical stab.) - I don't know exactly where it is (was already in when I got the plane) but I get the cable out of the vert. stab. so I guess it must be in there somewhere. =20 The COM antenna gets split with a duplexer for the GPS1 and GPS2 COM input =20 I assume that my radio problems are related to the metallic paint and the carbon bottom of the tail /elevator the shield the antenna please tell me if you have a different opinion. =20 All my antenna cables are split at a little interface plate behind the panel (see pic). It is fairly easy to disconnect and reconnect the cables. =20 My plan of action is (please feel free to tell me if I am talking nonsense) - Remove the marker antenna on the belly (I never use the marker signal on an ILS, I monitor the GPS 530 for my location and distance to way points, I would not notice if I lose this function) - Place an external COM antenna at the location of the marker antenna (I got about 1sqft of aluminum shield on the inside of the plane there - I would need a recommendation for which antenna to pick) - Reconnect the antenna cables at my interface plate: COM1 uses new external COM antenna (old marker antenna), COM2 uses existing internal antenna, the marker would have no antenna anymore - I would leave the duplexer in there for now and use only one output for the COM2 - I would remove the duplexer later it everything works fine - The COM1 input would be connected directly to the antenna without the duplexer =20 Thanks for your help =20 Ralf =20 =20 =20 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CCCBDD.715671C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Colyn,

Thank you for this helpful information – I let you know what = happens with my installation

Ralf

 

From:= = Colyn Case [mailto:colyncase@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, = January 04, 2012 4:38 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [LML] 4P com = issues

 

Ralf,

 

That sounds like a good plan.   I'm no antenna = expert but I did accumulate a few data points that I think might be = beneficial to the group:

 

- = define "good".   Good is it works if you have line of = sight to the transmitting station.   e.g. 100 miles at altitude. =  my cessna installation is not = "good".

- I also = have a Bob Archer in my tail.   From talking to several, if you = have an excellent installation you'll get 40+ miles range out of that = but there's a null directly in front of and behind the airplane. =  Bob Archer himself admits the null issue. As long as you never fly = direct-to you might be happy with that.

- Belly installation works best on a IV.  Ideally = you want a 22" radius ground plane although slightly less seems to = work.

- Tim Ong did some = tests that showed on a carbon airplane you'll do somewhat better with = the ground plane OUTSIDE the skin.

- Bob Pastusek has a belly whip mounted slightly = behind the front of the gear doors with an 18" internal aluminum = ground plane connected to an SL30. His reception is "good" by = above definition.

- I had = a similar installation connected to a gns530W.   My reception had = some prominent nulls.   I installed an external ground plane. =   We'll see what happens.

- connectors have some signal loss.  Diplexors = have significant signal loss.   Switches have some signal loss. =  I think I read somewhere on Bob Archer's web page that the loss = from a diplexor is about a 50% reduction in = range.

- Get Jim Weir's = RST-8020 antenna installation book.  Even if you don't build your = own antenna, it's really good basic easy to understand theoretical = background that will improve whatever you do.  It's available here = as part of his kit for $29.  http:/= /www.rst-engr.com/rst/catalog/airplane_antenna.html   He may be = willing to sell just the book for $10 and he may be willing to email you = the .pdf .   Mail order from Jim may take a few = weeks.

- somebody asked = about using a nav antenna for a com antenna.   The antenna length = is optimized for the wavelength used.   e.g. a com antenna should = have a vswr of around 1.0 at the middle of the com frequency range. =  com signals are vertically polarized.  nav signals are = horizontally polarized.   A com monopole needs a good ground plane. =  You could put one sticking up or down out of a wingtip if you = provided the ground plane in the wingtip = surface.

 

 

All that said, if I had it to do over again, this is = what my IVP com installation would look = like:

- Com 1 antenna as = far forward on the belly as I could get 18" radius.  Wire = directly to the radio with only the one connector at the = radio.

- use a commercial = whip with the lowest vswr I can find.

- lay in an external copper tape 8-pointed ground = plane (like an asterisk)  and connect it all with conductive paint. =    Conductive paint alone works great but there's some belief = that it develops fissures over time so the copper tape makes a more = reliable system.

- Com 2 = also on the belly 36" or more back.    take what I can = get for ground plane.   The rationale is it's better than a = portable whip and probably good enough for ground ops.  (If I had a = fiberglas airplane I would put it the other way up in the baggage = compartment)

- Com 2 = wiring includes 2 connectors: 1 at radio and one accessible that I can = disconnect and plug in my portable.   This is bad for com 2 but = more reliable than a diplexor and more optimal for the = portable.

 

Colyn

 

On = Jan 3, 2012, at 3:03 PM, <bronnenmeier@GROBSYSTEMS.COM= > <bronnenmeier@GROBSYSTEMS.COM= > wrote:



Dear = subscribers,=

 =

My com = radio is not working as it should. In some areas it is working perfect. = In other areas it does not work well. It seems to be worse at high = altitude/high speeds and along the shore lines or over the great lakes. = It is possible that I can barely read the controller and 20 miles = further it is decent. On the ground or around an airport it always works = ok. Sometimes I get a lot of static noise (depending on the airport). = Sometimes the controller sounds like he would talk out of an helicopter. = I am using the bose head sets.

 =

I have = metallic paint. I got static wicks – all grounded well. I got a = Garmin GNS530W, a Garmin GNC250XL and a Garmin GMA340 Com Panel (see = pic)

 =

I got the = following antennas:

-        = ;  VOR (in = the fiberglass wing tip internally) – never had an = issue

-        = ;  transponder= (wing root externally) – never had an = issue

-        = ;  marker = (externally under the 0 of the N# - see pic) – never had an = issue

-        = ;  GPS1 = (internally in vertical stab. ) works ok – if I do two rolls in a = row the GPS loses signal – other than that no = issues

-        = ;  GPS2 = (internally in vertical stab.) works = fine

-        = ;  COM = (internally in vertical stab.) – I don’t know exactly where = it is (was already in when I got the plane) but I get the cable out of = the vert. stab. so I guess it must be in there = somewhere.

 =

The COM = antenna gets split with a duplexer for the GPS1 and GPS2 COM = input

 =

I assume = that my radio problems are related to the metallic paint and the carbon = bottom of the tail /elevator the shield the antenna please tell me if = you have a different opinion.

 =

All my = antenna cables are split at a little interface plate behind the panel = (see pic). It is fairly easy to disconnect and reconnect the = cables.

 =

My plan of = action is (please feel free to tell me if I am talking = nonsense)

-        = ;  Remove the = marker antenna on the belly (I never use the marker signal on an ILS, I = monitor the GPS 530 for my location and distance to way points, I would = not notice if I lose this function)

-        = ;  Place an = external COM antenna at the location of the marker antenna (I got about = 1sqft of aluminum shield on the inside of the plane there - I would need = a recommendation for which antenna to = pick)

-        = ;  Reconnect = the antenna cables at my interface plate: COM1 uses new external COM = antenna (old marker antenna), COM2 uses existing internal antenna, the = marker would have no antenna anymore

-        = ;  I would = leave the duplexer in there for now and use only one output for the COM2 = – I would remove the duplexer later it everything works = fine

-        = ;  The COM1 = input would be connected directly to the antenna without the = duplexer

 =

Thanks for = your help

 =

Ralf

 =

 =

 =

<antenna3.= jpg><antenna1.JPG><antenna2.JPG>--
For archives and = unsub http://mail= .lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

=

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01CCCBDD.715671C0--