X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 07:49:51 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.5000feet.com ([74.115.8.50] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTP id 5266736 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:48:22 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.115.8.50; envelope-from=Tim@myrv10.com Received: from [10.100.125.110] (shecsurfer.shhec.org [74.115.8.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.5000feet.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/TO20111107) with ESMTP id pB1Jlmhm006928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:47:48 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <4ED7D9E4.5030007@MyRV10.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 13:47:48 -0600 From: Tim Olson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: cheltons losing gps signal References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The GPS on the Chelton isn't integrated into the circuitry of the AHRS but is a stand-alone GPS (If you're talking about the pinpoint/Chelton GADAHRS). The software revisions really should have nothing at all to do with any GPS issues. If someone really wants to know if the GPS is working or if the problem is further into the system or not, it's actually really pretty simple. All you'd have to do is set up a laptop running a serial port with pins 2 and 5 being the only ones that matter. Hook the ground on the pin 5 on the PC to the same ground or airframe ground as the AHRS uses. Then for the pin 2 connection, unplug the harness from your screen and figure out which pin (by wiring diagram) your GPS is coming into the system on, and make a jumper wire from that pin (using a pin/socket crimped onto the wire) running from that wire of your J1 harness (likely pin 1 on J1) to your laptop. Then just fire up the laptop and watch using hyper term or any comm program set to 9600 baud N81 and watch what you get. This all sounds way more complex than it really is, but it's very simple...just 2 wires and you can "listen" to the GPS and if you see messages with Lat/Long and other info in there you can log it and many folks can tell you if it looks normal or not. (do this in clear view of the sky with satellites in view) I had to do this to find out what the GPS messages coming from a GPS looked like, into my new ELT early this year. Once I got the messages it was easy to see that I was missing one type of message due to the particular GPS I was using, and so I got a different one and it had the necessary string being passed. The theory is the same though...if you see no good data, the GPS is bad. If it's an intermittent problem, then of course you'd have to monitor it while it was bad. Then it's a bit trickier because you're going to have to splice that wire so you can actually fly and have the cable ready to plug into your laptop...and you would only want to have this in place for when you are diagnosing that problem. At any rate, your issue is likely either going to be: 1) a wiring or connector issue 2) an antenna or ground plane issue 3) a failing GPS 4) a failing serial port on the EFIS It's really not likely that it's a software issue at all. Tim On 12/1/2011 12:05 PM, Dr. Weinsweig wrote: > i don't know when the software came out but tech support at cobham > emailed it to me and we installed it. i'm not sure if that was a > great idea as shortly after that one screen went belly up requiring > an "overhaul" and i never had a problem with the gps signal before. > perhaps the software made the units too sensitive. i should mention > that the gps signal on the cnx80 and my ipad foreflight was not lost- > only the cheltons intermittently and i have not seen it lost on the > ground only in flight temporarily. i should also mention during the > time of overhaul i had a gtx 327 transponder installed in the panel > and the remote sl70 removed so lots of "minor" wiring changes. > however, i was told that the cheltons are much more sensitve and > require a "better signal" than typical gps. i wonder if the update > just made mine too sensitive but we'll be troubleshooting and if/when > we figure it out i'll let you know. one fellow told me he saw the > gps signal totally disappear requiring a new receiver so maybe that's > it though intermittent problems are always more dfficult to track > down. > > thanks, > > david weinsweig 304-633-5221 weinsweigd@gmail.com n750dw propjet > > > -- For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html