Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #60223
From: Scott E Keighan <scottekeighan@sympatico.ca>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: Re: E-Mag/P-Mag
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:50:28 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

 For those using the p-mag.  Is there any significant increase in fuel efficiency or
increase in performance noticed?
 
Thanks
Scott Keighan
LIV non-turbo 170hrs
 
 
 

 
> To: lml@lancaironline.net
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:43:02 -0500
> From: n5zq@verizon.net
> Subject: [LML] Re: E-Mag/P-Mag
> 
> Pete,
> 
> We've been running p-mags on our 320 for about 1,400 hrs now. They improve 
> efficiency, make for easy, quick starts (a blade or two), are lighter and 
> smaller than traditional mags and have fewer moving parts. Being self 
> powered, the "p" version can be installed in place of both mags without 
> backup electric or extra batteries. It uses ships power for start and up to 
> around 12-1400 rpm. Above that, it's internal alternator is the primary 
> power with ships power being backup. We like ours and are in the queue for 
> the 6 cylinder version for our IV.
> 
> Bill Harrelson
> N5ZQ 320 2,000 hrs
> N6ZQ IV under construction
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Pete Cavitt
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 8:12 AM
> To: lml@lancaironline.net
> Subject: [LML] E-Mag/P-Mag
> 
> Anyone running E-Mag/P-Mags on their LNC2? What are the pitfalls? I've 
> tried using the Lightspeed electronic ignition with very poor results - 
> wouldn't work for more than a few minutes at a time, even after having Klaus 
> take a look at it.
> 
> Pete Cavitt - N320PL
> +1-619-701-0784 Cell
> www.petecavitt.com
> 
> 
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster