X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:50:28 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from snt0-omc3-s5.snt0.hotmail.com ([65.55.90.144] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTP id 5201666 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:11:39 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.90.144; envelope-from=scottekeighan@sympatico.ca Received: from SNT129-W1 ([65.55.90.136]) by snt0-omc3-s5.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:11:04 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: scottekeighan@sympatico.ca Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_abb5bcce-00af-40e8-929a-76b8844896ec_" X-Originating-IP: [70.27.73.191] From: Scott E Keighan X-Original-To: Subject: RE: Re: E-Mag/P-Mag X-Original-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:11:04 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <9661B9C9-D90E-4C92-ACD6-059B9F8B1C11@verizon.net> References: ,,<9661B9C9-D90E-4C92-ACD6-059B9F8B1C11@verizon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2011 02:11:04.0756 (UTC) FILETIME=[FEBD8740:01CCA404] --_abb5bcce-00af-40e8-929a-76b8844896ec_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For those using the p-mag. Is there any significant increase in fuel effi= ciency or increase in performance noticed? =20 Thanks Scott Keighan LIV non-turbo 170hrs =20 =20 =20 =20 > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Date: Tue=2C 15 Nov 2011 10:43:02 -0500 > From: n5zq@verizon.net > Subject: [LML] Re: E-Mag/P-Mag >=20 > Pete=2C >=20 > We've been running p-mags on our 320 for about 1=2C400 hrs now. They impr= ove=20 > efficiency=2C make for easy=2C quick starts (a blade or two)=2C are light= er and=20 > smaller than traditional mags and have fewer moving parts. Being self=20 > powered=2C the "p" version can be installed in place of both mags without= =20 > backup electric or extra batteries. It uses ships power for start and up = to=20 > around 12-1400 rpm. Above that=2C it's internal alternator is the primary= =20 > power with ships power being backup. We like ours and are in the queue fo= r=20 > the 6 cylinder version for our IV. >=20 > Bill Harrelson > N5ZQ 320 2=2C000 hrs > N6ZQ IV under construction >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message-----=20 > From: Pete Cavitt > Sent: Tuesday=2C November 15=2C 2011 8:12 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] E-Mag/P-Mag >=20 > Anyone running E-Mag/P-Mags on their LNC2? What are the pitfalls? I've=20 > tried using the Lightspeed electronic ignition with very poor results -=20 > wouldn't work for more than a few minutes at a time=2C even after having = Klaus=20 > take a look at it. >=20 > Pete Cavitt - N320PL > +1-619-701-0784 Cell > www.petecavitt.com >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml = --_abb5bcce-00af-40e8-929a-76b8844896ec_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 =3BFor those using the p-mag. =3B Is there any significant inc= rease in fuel efficiency or
increase in performance noticed?
 =3B
Thanks
Scott Keighan
LIV non-turbo 170hrs
 =3B
 =3B
 =3B
 =3B
>=3B To: =3Blml@lancaironline.net
>=3B Date= : Tue=2C 15 Nov 2011 10:43:02 -0500
>=3B From: =3Bn5zq@veri= zon.net
>=3B Subject: [LML] Re: E-Mag/P-Mag
>=3B =3B
>=3B Pete=2C
>=3B =3B
>=3B We've been run= ning p-mags on our 320 for about 1=2C400 hrs now. They improve =3B
>=3B efficiency=2C make fo= r easy=2C quick starts (a blade or two)=2C are lighter and =3B
>=3B smaller than traditional ma= gs and have fewer moving parts. Being self =3B
>=3B powered=2C the "p" version can be installed= in place of both mags without = =3B
>=3B backup electric or extra batteries. It uses ships powe= r for start and up to =3B=
>=3B around 12-1400 rpm. Above that=2C it's internal alternator is th= e primary =3B
>=3B p= ower with ships power being backup. We like ours and are in the queue for =3B
>=3B the 6 cylind= er version for our IV.
>=3B&nbs= p=3B
>=3B Bill Harrelson
>=3B N5ZQ 320 2=2C000 hrs
>= =3B N6ZQ IV under construction
>=3B =3B
>=3B = =3B
>=3B =3B<= BR>>=3B =3B
>=3B -= ----Original Message----- =3B
>=3B From: Pete Cavitt
>=3B Sent: Tuesday=2C November 15=2C = 2011 8:12 AM
>=3B To: =3Blml@lancaironline.net
= >=3B Subject: [LML] E-Mag/P-Mag
>=3B =3B
>=3B Anyone running E-Mag/P-Mags on their LNC2?= What are the pitfalls? I've =3B=
>=3B tried using the Lightspeed electronic ignition with very = poor results - =3B
>= =3B wouldn't work for more than a few minutes at a time=2C even after havin= g Klaus =3B
>=3B tak= e a look at it.
>=3B =3B
>=3B Pete Cavitt - N320PL
>=3B +1-619-701-0784 Cell
>= =3B =3Bwww.petecavitt.com
>=3B =3B
>=3B =3B
>=3B --
>=3B For archives a= nd unsub =3Bhttp://= mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

= --_abb5bcce-00af-40e8-929a-76b8844896ec_--