X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:11:47 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5153171@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <dico@internetworks.ca>
Received: from mail-iy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1)
  with ESMTPS id 5152632 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:52:38 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=dico@internetworks.ca
Received: by iakc1 with SMTP id c1so7369218iak.25
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.154.7 with SMTP id o7mr21321717icw.48.1318290723741; Mon,
 10 Oct 2011 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.167.131 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:52:03 -0300
X-Original-Message-ID: <CAAHhPZTxfZeqK2ihoJT7wFY+taFxbfzY=ZsFoZqrtLtDi6DhnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Replacing Whelan strobe with AveoMaxx 6 in 1
From: Dico Reijers <dico@internetworks.ca>
X-Original-To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba1efd2e4c9ea804aefa7a43

--90e6ba1efd2e4c9ea804aefa7a43
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi All,

I'm looking to replace my wingtip lighting and happened upon the aveomaxx 6
in 1.

I figure that going to LED and their low power consumption will potentially
solve the issue with the current strobes interfering with my stormscope.

Also, the extra landing lights and wig wag would be safer on landings I
would think.

Has anyonw used this setup before on IV-Ps?

http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/aveomaxx.php

Regards,

Dico

--90e6ba1efd2e4c9ea804aefa7a43
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi All,<br><br>I&#39;m looking to replace my wingtip lighting and happened =
upon the aveomaxx 6 in 1. <br><br>I figure that going to LED and their low =
power consumption will potentially solve the issue with the current strobes=
 interfering with my stormscope.<br>
<br>Also, the extra landing lights and wig wag would be safer on landings I=
 would think.<br><br>Has anyonw used this setup before on IV-Ps?<br><br><a =
href=3D"http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/aveomaxx.php">http://=
www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/elpages/aveomaxx.php</a><br>
<br>Regards,<br><br>Dico<br>

--90e6ba1efd2e4c9ea804aefa7a43--