X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 07:36:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [198.64.152.110] (HELO sdc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5144430 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:57:19 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=198.64.152.110; envelope-from=Ronald@sdc.com Received: from [192.168.1.102] [68.202.59.4] by sdc.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-11.5) id 86dc00016ce5ab84; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:55:20 -0400 From: Ronald STEVENS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: More about leaning but now using TIT X-Original-Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:56:48 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Hello guys I was also reading about leaning using the TIT's instead of the EGT's. = According to continental the TIT's almost peak at the same time as the = EGT.=20 Any experiences you can share? Do you use the first or last TIT, and how = much temp diff. do you use? Thanks -- Ronald ps I did a gammi spread test and I am excited to say that my spread was = only 0.4gph :)~