X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:08:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5142662 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:18:54 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=rmAiy8QXYlBcYgD6XNHqao/jFbt1xoePBWf8PmFaJmtBLj5ItkVTx6ra6KWJ8E83; h=Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [70.16.214.164] (helo=[192.168.1.24]) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1RA9l4-0000P7-9W for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:18:18 -0400 From: Colyn Case Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-68--94919380 Subject: Re: [LML] Question regarding EMS (JPI, Dynon...) X-Original-Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 20:18:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: <62B1B1AD-777B-419C-B874-5D157A79644A@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940cd86087e40a7b045df633e2a31529f12350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 70.16.214.164 --Apple-Mail-68--94919380 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 I've had pretty good luck with my grt system. They make the eis6000 = which is really what the Chelton systems use. I bought their basic EFIS = for display purposes. I have not had problems with their hardware = boxes or software. I did have to rewire my CHT and EGT probes to avoid = shorting. Anyway, I'm sure they would be happy to tell you if you can use your old = probes or not. Many people have had excellent service with the EI system. But they = will probably make you replace all your probes. Again call and find = out. I'm sure you won't be the first VM refugee. On Oct 1, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Patrick Hayoz wrote: > Hello to all, >=20 > My engine monitoring system is a Vision Microsystems (VM) EPI 800 and = worked > well for the last eight years =96 and still works fine. >=20 > I'm thinking of a replacement system =96 in case of a major failure of = the actual system. >=20 > My recent research showed that most of the installed sensors are = compatible with the > EMS used today. >=20 > Fuelprobe compatibility? > Does anybody knows about the compatibility of the VM Fuel probes? I = have two of them > installed in the wings. A calibration was done back in 2002 to respect = of the Fueltank geometry=85 >=20 > Which system to for? > What are y=20 > Any hints and thoughts are welcome, thank you. >=20 > Patrick, LNC2, Switzerland >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-68--94919380 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 I've = had pretty good luck with my grt system. They make the eis6000 = which is really what the Chelton systems use. I bought their basic = EFIS for display purposes. I have not had problems with their = hardware boxes or software. I did have to rewire my CHT and EGT = probes to avoid shorting.

Anyway, I'm sure they would be happy to = tell you if you can use your old probes or = not.

Many people have had excellent service = with the EI system. But they will probably make you replace all = your probes. Again call and find out. I'm sure you won't be = the first VM refugee.

On Oct 1, = 2011, at 9:29 AM, Patrick Hayoz wrote:

Hello to = all,

My engine monitoring system is a Vision = Microsystems (VM) EPI 800 and worked
well for the last eight = years =96 and still works fine.

I'm thinking of = a replacement system =96 in case of a major failure of the actual = system.

My recent research showed that most of = the installed sensors are compatible with the
EMS used = today.

Fuelprobe = compatibility?
Does anybody knows about the compatibility = of the VM Fuel probes? I have two of them
installed in the = wings. A calibration was done back in 2002 to respect of the Fueltank = geometry=85

Which system to = for?
What are y<our experiences with JPI, Dynon and = others?

Any hints and thoughts are welcome, = thank you.

Patrick, LNC2, = Switzerland

= --Apple-Mail-68--94919380--