X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:35:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm23-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([98.139.53.220] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with SMTP id 5028364 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:10:22 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.53.220; envelope-from=wfhannahan@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.52.197] by nm23.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2011 07:09:46 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.136] by tm10.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2011 07:09:46 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2011 07:09:46 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 255714.13459.bm@omp1019.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 37881 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jun 2011 07:09:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sbD77ITXSgFSAmvwnrf6e7NR3bvHFBz0G60htrbkSP4b3upCZtLnMQ0zoIsK1RpihSAt4LEGXgLIQMusAbOCP/IoQFo5W8pgTWiwRYs3EM4BWwgBfVRyrfKSQGetSx/I+hwAUbb4Glri4ql1cbgSIctPwDsdOL60lgzYTYuVYIA=; X-YMail-OSG: wo.KBBYVM1k7IfqwdF5G6iA6bxW.JDrLvElaGuef3rrd9X0 nFwPEbiE9v6GUVIuGQOeeneXtwlz39e5CMbKMmKJ.QToumGXum._jH0ECHh. ZAxnz3ehxNAr7B1I1d8fJx0DZusGBjMMP9p7DyJ1c5tDnMYJSyUZ8KKAgDiR _s9wQ7y5BmFsLwJ5c11GU28GifTOwcebnzSYsvrn10G2TKGBoz41evT8swyF JVAE6BllnE_f7FEwGFo03WtMwPS47d6dbBPTB0YEwbCUliFm5790b0QYn.Je 2ttN5e1.gPXSOnpVEiOE0ljW3ow4Gr.wrbk1uElT9mdr1B8nZVW3E9EApuyy DCJ3IfJDqffQtL4zcKH9CfdLH0aOsAMFp0MlKyrtinlKIBWQ2s_hanw-- Received: from [174.29.162.41] by web33905.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:09:45 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.112.307740 X-Original-Message-ID: <1308726585.36718.YahooMailClassic@web33905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:09:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Hannahan Subject: LNC2 Desser tires again X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1114826923-1308726585=:36718" --0-1114826923-1308726585=:36718 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Please, what were the markings on the tires?] =0A=0A=0A=0A100 MPH=C2=A0=C2=A0 DTR 5572=0A=0A=C2=A0=0A=0A11 X 4 =E2=80=93 = 5=C2=A0 8PR=0A=0A=C2=A0=0A=0A494-0609=0A=0A=C2=A0=0A=0ATUBELESS=C2=A0 LOAD = 500 LB=0A@70 PSI=0A=0A=C2=A0=0A=0AMADE IN VIETNAM=0A=0A Regards, Bill Hannahan =20 wfhannahan@yahoo.com --- On Tue, 6/21/11, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: From: Sky2high@aol.com Subject: [LML] Re: LNC2 Desser tires again To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 12:59 PM =0A=0A =0A=0APlease, what were the markings on the tires?=C2=A0 As is often= usual in the =0Aexperimental field the part no. is meaningless since the m= anufacturer can change =0Asupplier or internal specs and never change the p= art number.=C2=A0 We now have =0Apeople satisfied with the Desser that is m= arked "not to exceed 65 mph" or "ok to =0A100 mph" and "made in vietnam".= =C2=A0 Which freaking tire is failing?=C2=A0 When =0Awas it bought?=C2=A0 I= have no problems with the lo speed tire but I have 2 =0Amarked "made in vi= etnam" in reserve.=C2=A0 I would like to know if that tire is =0Aadequate f= or a replacement of the older tire...............=0A=C2=A0=0AGrayhawk=C2=A0= =0A=C2=A0=0A=0AIn a message dated 6/20/2011 6:55:58 P.M. Central Daylight T= ime, =0Awfhannahan@yahoo.com writes:=0A=0A =0A =0A =0A =20 =0A =0A =0A =0A =0A#yiv324267474 st1\00003a*{}= =0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A Luke,=0A =C2=A0 =0A I b= ought two areo classic tires at =0A Oshkosh last summer. A few month= s =0A ago I replaced the mains with one areo classic tire and one Ch= eng-Shin =0A to compare performance. The cracks showed up almost imm= ediately in the =0A aero classic. =0A =C2=A0 =0A No = =0A chunking or balance problems yet. No noticeable difference in ro= lling =0A resistance. Too early to tell about wear rate.=0A = =C2=A0 =0A =0A =0A =0A =0A =0A=0A=0A=0A = My impression is that the rubber compound is too hard =0A or = simply of a poor quality for this application. Bill Hannahan =0A =C2=A0=20 --0-1114826923-1308726585=:36718 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
[Please, what were the markings on th= e tires?]

=0A= =0A=0A

100 MPH &nbs= p; DTR 5572

=0A=0A

 

=0A= =0A

11 X 4 =E2=80=93 5  = 8PR

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A

494-0609

=0A=0A

 

= =0A=0A

TUBELESS  LOAD 50= 0 LB=0A@70 PSI

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A<= p class=3D"MsoNormal">MADE IN VIETNAM

=0A=0A

Regards,
=
Bill Hannahan


-= -- On Tue, 6/21/11, Sky2high@aol.com <Sky2high@aol.com>= wrote:

From: Sky2high@aol.com <Sky2high= @aol.com>
Subject: [LML] Re: LNC2 Desser tires again
To: lml@lanca= ironline.net
Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 12:59 PM

=0A=0A =0A=0A
Please, what were the = markings on the tires?  As is often usual in the =0Aexperimental field= the part no. is meaningless since the manufacturer can change =0Asupplier = or internal specs and never change the part number.  We now have =0Ape= ople satisfied with the Desser that is marked "not to exceed 65 mph" or "ok= to =0A100 mph" and "made in vietnam".  Which freaking tire is failing= ?  When =0Awas it bought?  I have no problems with the lo speed t= ire but I have 2 =0Amarked "made in vietnam" in reserve.  I would like= to know if that tire is =0Aadequate for a replacement of the older tire...= ............
=0A
 
=0A
Grayhawk 
=0A
 
=0A
=0A<= div>In a message dated 6/20/2011 6:55:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time= , =0Awfhannahan@yahoo.com writes:
=0A
=0A =0A= =0A =0A

=0A =0A = =0A =0A =0A= =0A =0A=0A

Luke,

=0A =

 

=0A

I bought two areo classic tires at =0A Oshkosh last summer. A few months =0A ago I replaced t= he mains with one areo classic tire and one Cheng-Shin =0A to compar= e performance. The cracks showed up almost immediately in the =0A ae= ro classic.

=0A

 

=0A =

No =0A chunking or balance problems yet. No noticeab= le difference in rolling =0A resistance. Too early to tell about wea= r rate.

=0A

 

= =0A

=0A =0A =0A = =0A =0A=0A

My impres= sion is that the rubber compound is too hard =0A or simply of a poor= quality for this application.


Bill Hannahan

=0A

 


--0-1114826923-1308726585=:36718--