X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:56:49 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.228] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5019581 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:50:02 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.59.228; envelope-from=rob@robmurawski.com Received: from omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.74]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vcnz1g0041c6gX85FcpSmV; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:49:26 +0000 Received: from wintermute.rob-home.local. ([76.120.176.49]) by omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id vcpQ1g00F14KV5G3jcpR6a; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:49:26 +0000 Received: from darkside (darkside.rob-home.local [192.168.0.50]) by wintermute.rob-home.local. (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5E0nIa3025147 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:49:18 -0400 From: "Rob Murawski" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: N numbers X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:49:17 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <006c01cc2a2c$e4141230$ac3c3690$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_006D_01CC2A0B.5D027230" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: AcwqCJoTEK6hi4TRRTy4vBssQAXpSgAIzvDw Content-Language: en-us X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: p5E0nIa3025147 X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.999, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00) X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-From: rob@robmurawski.com MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1308617359.05@+9A/lLdAf0ISsoXxVfuPtA This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_006D_01CC2A0B.5D027230 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When the DC area was an ADIZ, I believe you needed 12 inch numbers to = fly within the ADIZ area. I thought I heard somewhere you still need 12 = inch numbers in the SFRA, but I can=E2=80=99t find a reliable reference. = It would seem to me that this would be one of the bigger changes by = designating it as an SFRA vs. an ADIZ, since I can=E2=80=99t find = anything procedure-wise that substantially changed with this name = change. =20 Since I plan to be popping into the SFRA frequently (and potentially = going for FRZ access after my LNC2 is flying if I ever think I could = land at KCGS) I=E2=80=99m going to do the 12-inch numbers to be safe. = Which means I need to find an N-number that is short enough that it fits = on my plane! (I=E2=80=99m envious of N91CZ!) =20 Any list members based within the SFRA know anything different? =20 -Rob =20 ------=_NextPart_000_006D_01CC2A0B.5D027230 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

When the DC area was an ADIZ, I believe you needed 12 inch numbers to = fly within the ADIZ area.=C2=A0 I thought I heard somewhere you still = need 12 inch numbers in the SFRA, but I can=E2=80=99t find a reliable = reference.=C2=A0 It would seem to me that this would be one of the = bigger changes by designating it as an SFRA vs. an ADIZ, since I = can=E2=80=99t find anything procedure-wise that substantially changed = with this name change.

 

Since I plan to be popping into the SFRA frequently (and potentially = going for FRZ access after my LNC2 is flying if I ever think I could = land at KCGS) I=E2=80=99m going to do the 12-inch numbers to be = safe.=C2=A0 Which means I need to find an N-number that is short enough = that it fits on my plane!=C2=A0 (I=E2=80=99m envious of = N91CZ!)

 

Any list members based within the SFRA know anything = different?

 

-Rob

 

------=_NextPart_000_006D_01CC2A0B.5D027230--