Jay:
I'm biased. So take this with a grain of salt.
I love my IVP. I'm currently on the "road" traveling in my IVP. I brought with me a huge suitcase, communications gear, and, most importantly, golf clubs (including the giant mondo tour bag). I climb out at 1500 FPM at about 40 GPH, cruise at 17 GPH, and can fly much longer than I can go without having to take a pee. I can hit Vegas from my home in Seattle, non-stop. Or Fresno to see the grand kids.
Pressurization is lovely. Air conditioning is sweet. Having a back seat to load up with gear, and a baggage section in the tail, lets me bring the kitchen sink with me on the road.
For everything else, there's MasterCard.
The only better load handler was my Cessna T210, where you could take out the back seats and carry an extra Corvette engine for a friend. But I didn't have pressurization or air conditioning, and I flew at 155 KIAS versus 270 KIAS.
A turbine climbs out faster, but burns way more fuel and doesn't have the range or the load capacity. Admittedly, it is sexier, but you can't take as much stuff or go as far. Or get insurance.
The new Lancair Evolution is a great bird, but won't hit 300 KIAS in cruise. Even so, If money is no object for you, I would recommend an Evolution, rather than a IVP-T. Or better yet, a Piper Jet, or a Pilatus.
And I hear the new Gulfstream is pretty nice.
But for the money, the IVP with a Continental TSIO 550 is a pretty cool, sexy, cost efficient, capable machine. Too bad they aren't making the kits any more. Big mistake on the part of Lancair, IMHO.
And in the end, airplanes are like women. Everyone likes something a little different.
Call if you want to chat.
John Hafen IVP 413AJ 300 hours 206 830-0700
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Jay Phillips wrote: I’ve owned my Legacy for about 18 months and 230 hours. It’s hard to imagine living without it. But I’ve started to look longingly at IV-P’s and IV-PT’s. My main interest is pressurization. Additional speed and seats would be nice. My wife’s main interest is air conditioning (I know that A/C is available for the Legacy. I’m not telling her about that J ). I’ve been doing my research on costs, both acquisition and operation, and I think I have a understanding of those. I’m looking for comments/observations regarding the wisdom or lack thereof of moving from a Legacy to a IV-P. I’m also interested in people’s thoughts on the turbine versus piston. I’ve read a bunch on this topic. My conclusion is that, logically, there are insufficient benefits (relative to costs) to the turbine. But there are large emotional benefits, and if there was no emotional satisfaction in flying I probably wouldn’t do it at all. My wife (the more rational member of this partnership) says I need to fly in both types (piston and turbine) before I make a choice. She’s probably right (she usually is). Anyone west of the Mississippi (I’m in Prescott, AZ, but willing to travel) willing to introduce me to the joys of the IV-P (piston or turbine)? Jay Phillips Legacy N92SX From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jay Phillips Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 9:48 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: FltPlan I used the model they have “built-in” (LEG2). Works well enough for my purposes. Jay Phillips From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jon Socolof Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 4:50 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] FltPlan Anyone have Legacy performance data in FltPlan.com and want to share or know which A/C type is similar? Jon |