Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #58488
From: Robert Mitchell <mitchell715@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Long mount / short tail
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 12:50:48 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Bill,
Just curious, where did your battery and hydraulic pump end up?  I have same configuration, except for 3 blade MT prop and have been considering behind the seat for the pump and firewall for the battery!  ( not yet weighed for cg )

Bob Mitchell
L-320 N56SH

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 4, 2011, at 8:52 AM, "Bill Harrelson" <n5zq@verizon.net> wrote:

Phil,
 
We have a long mount – small tail 320. I have zero complaints about control authority or elevator characteristics and we’re coming up on 2,000 hrs and 10 years. Why would you consider the large tail an “upgrade”?  If I were building again, I’d be willing to pay extra for the small tail.
 
Bill Harrelson
N5ZQ 320 1,950 hrs
N6ZQ  IV under construction
 
 
 
 
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:28 AM
Subject: [LML] Long mount / short tail
 

I know the big tail / small tail is hotly debated, but I currently have a long engine mount and a small tail 360 kit. I am not going to upgrade to the large tail if I can fly this aircraft in the long mount / short tail configuration.

 

Is any on this list flying a small tail and a long engine mount with a 360 engine? If so, can you tell me about your flight characteristics? Has anyone also flown the small tail / short mount and can provide some comparisons?

 

Thank you,

 

Phil

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster