Return-Path: Received: from mta5.snfc21.pbi.net ([206.13.28.241]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 14:38:31 -0400 Received: from postoffice.pacbell.net ([206.170.7.25]) by mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0FWD000225DD9D@mta5.snfc21.pbi.net> for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 11:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 11:39:36 -0700 From: fmoreno4@postoffice.pacbell.net Subject: OSH and LIV/ES doors To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-to: fmoreno4@pacbell.net Message-id: <394D1767.BA8A4FB9@postoffice.pacbell.net> References: <20000618044835.AAA2790@ns1.olsusa.com> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Jim, I would be willing to talk again. Just need to figure out what to talk about. Could discuss the long range tank project with John Forker, if folks are interested. Just got back from visiting the factory, and can confirm new door option. Discussed with Doug at length, saw the prototype, nicely done, all assembled and ready to bolt in, piece of cake. Also, the non-P will have two latches at bottom as noted earlier. Pins eliminated. My door on my non-P is done, and uses pins since that was the only option then. However, in learning about door deflection due to seal and also due to low external pressure compared to the interior (about 30 pounds per square foot, I estimate) I beefed up the door frame with a lot of unidirectional carbon which greatly increased stiffness since the door frame and door itself are made up of carbn on the bias which is much less stiff in bending, but great in shear. In my scientific test, I put the door on the floor, stood on it, and measured the deflection which I recall was in the vicinity of 3/8 to 1/2 inch (I weigh in at 200, wet). After addition of unicarbon in various locations and multiple thicknesses, deflection was less than 1/16. I think this will solve the problem with the pins, but the new factory solution is better. If any are interested in how I did the detailed reinforcement, let me know and I can make some sketches. F >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>