X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:09:07 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma06.mx.aol.com ([64.12.78.142] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2o) with ESMTP id 4880002 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:55:37 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.78.142; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-ma06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p1NFspIw015522 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:54:51 -0500 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.f5d.ee3c275 (44631) for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:54:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-md02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-md02.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.155]) by cia-mc01.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC014-d4304d652dbc1f5; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:54:45 -0500 Received: from webmail-d009 (webmail-d009.sim.aol.com [205.188.181.28]) by smtprly-md02.mx.aol.com (v129.9) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMD027-d4304d652dbc1f5; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:54:36 -0500 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Antenna type and placement X-Original-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:54:36 -0500 X-AOL-IP: 76.211.85.30 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CDA1891AF248C3_7BC_49A51_webmail-d009.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33222-STANDARD Received: from 76.211.85.30 by webmail-d009.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.28) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:54:36 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CDA1891AEB24A0-7BC-1F8BD@webmail-d009.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: VTAILJEFF@aol.com ----------MB_8CDA1891AF248C3_7BC_49A51_webmail-d009.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Tom, The antennae cannot see through carbon. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: TOM GARDINER To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Wed, Feb 23, 2011 8:09 am Subject: [LML] Antenna type and placement Folks=20 =20 I am experiencing a dreadful time getting my COM radios to perform to thei= r full (or even half) potential in my LNC2. I have two Bob Archer's mount= ed in the tailcone and in the proper orientation with a VSWR of around 1.5= with RG 400 cable. The antennas are fed by two Garmin 430s with a measur= ed output of 8 watts each. The thing is that ATC and my flying friends re= port a consistently weak signal and the same applies on reception on my en= d. My airplane has the carbon tail and I built the seat bench using carbo= n on foam (bad idea in hindsight). I have tried another type of antenna= that is a dipole with a balun mounted in the center of the baggage secti= on in a vertical orientation but with little or no improvement in results. =20 =20 I am beginning to suspect the Lancair supplied Gray epoxy primer which I= understand contains aluminum oxide in the base =20 I am now considering mounting an external antenna but thought I would ask= if anybody had experienced similar issues and subsequently corrected them= . Any help/advice would be very much appreciated =20 Thanks =20 Tom =20 LNC2=20 24 hrs ----------MB_8CDA1891AF248C3_7BC_49A51_webmail-d009.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Tom,
 
The antennae cannot see through carbon.
 
Jeff



-----Original Message-----
From: TOM GARDINER <n20087@yahoo.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Wed, Feb 23, 2011 8:09 am
Subject: [LML] Antenna type and placement

Folks
 
I am experiencing a dreadful time getting my COM radios to perform to= their full (or even half) potential in my LNC2.  I have two Bob Arch= er's mounted in the tailcone and in the proper orientation with a VSWR of= around 1.5 with RG 400 cable.  The antennas are fed by two Garmin 43= 0s with a measured output of 8 watts each.  The thing is that AT= C and my flying friends report a consistently weak signal and the same app= lies on reception on my end.  My airplane has the carbon tail an= d I built the seat bench using carbon on foam (bad idea in hindsight).&nbs= p; I have tried another type of antenna that is a dipole with a= balun mounted in the  center of the baggage section in a vertical or= ientation but with little or no improvement in results.
 
 
I am beginning to suspect the Lancair supplied Gray epoxy primer whic= h I understand contains aluminum oxide in the base
 
I am now considering mounting an external antenna but thought I would= ask if anybody had experienced similar issues and subsequently corrected= them.  Any help/advice would be very much appreciated
 
Thanks
 
Tom
 
LNC2
24 hrs

----------MB_8CDA1891AF248C3_7BC_49A51_webmail-d009.sysops.aol.com--