X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:04:09 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ns1.properformance.no ([195.18.229.198] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2a) with ESMTPS id 4839222 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:36:19 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=195.18.229.198; envelope-from=roger@iverin.com Received: from 70.46.101.166.nw.nuvox.net ([70.46.101.166] helo=[192.168.1.106]) by ns1.properformance.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PlkAn-0004Hm-Ob for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:35:42 +0100 X-Original-Message-ID: <4D4D6E49.1060902@iverin.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:35:37 +0100 From: Roger Iverin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: MT Propeller inspection Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns1.properformance.no X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - iverin.com Folks, I have a MT Propeller that is due for 6 years control. However since it is a experimental a/c may I inspect the prop myself. Or will I need someone else with certification to do ? When I was a owner of a Kitfox we did all inspection. If yes of some reason, do anyone know about a shop in Florida who may do ? Please help me with this question. Best regards Roger Iverin