Return-Path: Received: from imo-d02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.34]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 08:55:20 -0400 Received: from CasaDeHate@aol.com by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.9.) id k.62.4210473 (4204) for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:01:13 -0400 (EDT) From: CasaDeHate@aol.com Message-ID: <62.4210473.266fa198@aol.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 09:01:12 EDT Subject: Legacy engine To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> << Which engine option (Cont. 550, Lyc. 360 turbo normalized or other) would you choose for this aircraft >> Too much power is never enough, as the saying goes. IMHO, humble or not, I would opt for the IO-550N engine in half a heartbeat. Slight weight tradeoff aside, the fact that 310hp is available in a simple normally aspirated engine. Any turbo system, normalized or boosted, adds complexity, cost, more heat to dissipate, and generally shortens the life expectancy of the cylinders. Improper operation of the turbo is costly.... I had the IO550G in my IV and before selling it I installed a "normalizing" system on it that worked as advertised, but for all the reasons above, if I hadn't sold it I would have removed the system and been a happier camper for doing so. I subscribe to the KISS principle whenever possible. More stuff= more possibilities of problems and breakdowns. Humbly: Mike DeHate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>