We fly behind an O-360 rebuilt by PE with 10:1 pistons and have
not had any operational problems after >600hrs. on the clock. We do see some
valve guide wear in one cylinder, which will have to be addressed soon as we
get oil leakage into the cylinder on the ground. Oil usage is less than 1qt /10hrs.
Rick (RV N146RV)
From: Lancair Mailing
List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Frederick Moreno
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 11:18 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Questions - Performance Engines Perfidity
John Barrett is
out of country and asked me to forward his post below. Fred
As owner of a TSIO 550 engine sold as
new/experimental, I have been following this discussion with growing concern.
I was involved with a group of three customers including Fred M. who
negotiated with Monson and ordered engines simultaneously. I have not had first
flight yet although I have run the engine on the aircraft enough to dial it in
for first flight.
Some questions and thoughts come to
mind:
1. Since the rush to purchase Performance
Engines products was fueled by testimonials on the LML from one or more
participants in the races at Reno, what can these owners tell us about their
experiences with PE products in the intervening time since those testimonials?
2. Are there PE customers out there who are
satisfied with their engines? What maintenance issues have surfaced for
them and how many hours have they got on theirs?
3. As owners of PE engines that have not
(yet?) had problems, what should we do to minimize risk to life and limb?
Should we treat this as if it were an AD note for complete tear down, or
is there some less painful alternative at this point?
John Barrett