Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #55718
From: Gary Edwards <gary21sn@hotmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Small tail, MK II tail, CG range
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:28:21 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
All the more reason to have an AOA indicator.
 
Gary Edwards
 
 
The CAFE report on the small tail 320 mentions the very low "stick force gradient" as
a problem. The stick force was found to be almost neutral at the rear CG limit.
As I understand it the gradient is much higher in the Legacy,
and about halfway in between on the large tail 360. 

I seem to remember
Greg Heinze of HPAT telling me the SFG numbers for the three models
on the phone...but I have since forgotten the
values he quoted.

I understand that a low gradient is a problem since the pilot has no feel that
he is pulling hard just before stall. Perhaps worse, in the stall, just releasing the stick pressure does not
unstall the A/C.  Rather, the pilot must calmly place the stick forward....preferably without inducing PIO, despite
the adrenaline load.

I don't know much aerodynamics but I am familiar with second order differential equations.
Having tuned servo systems, I would be wary of nuetral stability.  Wouldn't INstability be right around the corner?
Am I right about this?

The recent long debate on CG ranges has not so far discussed this. What is
the role of stick force gradient in this debate?

--
Jeff Peterson

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster