Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #55600
From: Wolfgang <Wolfgang@MiCom.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: MK II Tail
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:04:34 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Most of these comments, most in favor of the small tail, fail to quantify the difference in any meaningful way . . . which is quite aggravating.
I get the sense that "It's been that way for 50 years so why change now ?" attitude is the rule of the land.

I don't see how that is supposed to help others that know nothing of the difference understand the difference.
. . . Isn't that what this list is for ?

Wolfgang

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill N5ZQ" <n5zq@verizon.net>
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 9:04 PM
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: MK II Tail


And a good plan it is too, Angier.
I really like the small tail much better myself.

Bill Harrelson
N5ZQ 320 1,800 hrs with a small tail
N6ZQ  IV under construction


-----Original Message-----


Hmmm, my kit came with the large tail and I've flown a handful of
320s, all with the small tail.
I'm considering cutting off the large tail and installing a small one...

Angier Ames
N4ZQ


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster