X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:51:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-vw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.212.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTP id 4379604 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:18:48 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.212.52; envelope-from=vonjet@gmail.com Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so490033vws.25 for ; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=tz6jJdKh2gilO0BEB8gR7hT1bdRXfyvedvKy6PyzosCg0cFSS3upCFxXdyJauBE9Q3 2Ny+/ftEO98X+fHgwN9b2oHIokFbYIWjdZpUdsjQzODkZRbGUjsDqfGAlhyR7ADynuQ1 bb7q4VMZXUM6ecyT2Qjv5SJu+O+vNaF7qK0I4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.213.136 with SMTP id gw8mr208913qcb.193.1278166691954; Sat, 03 Jul 2010 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.50.2 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.50.2 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jul 2010 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 07:18:11 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail From: Bryan Wullner X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636284266a340bb048a7c5ff1 --001636284266a340bb048a7c5ff1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well said Bill K. Larger tail doesn't turn your Lancair into a Cessna. I would never trade my MKII for a small tailed Lancair. However, I wouldn't cut the small tail off and replace with a large tail if I already had one. Bryan On Jul 2, 2010 4:04 PM, "N320G" wrote: I agree! 1050 hours and never an issue. *From:* Peter Field *Sent:* Friday, July 02, 2010 4:28 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail > > Well said, Bill Rumburg!!! Don=92t mess up a good thing. > > > > Pete Field > > 320, Small Ta... --001636284266a340bb048a7c5ff1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well said Bill K. Larger tail doesn't turn your Lancair into a Cessn= a. I would never trade my MKII for a small tailed Lancair. However, I would= n't cut the small tail off and replace with a large tail if I already h= ad one.

Bryan

On Jul 2, 2010 4:04 PM, "N320G" <= n320g@hotmail.com> wrote:
I agree!=A0 1050 hours and never an=20 issue.
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:28 AM


> To: lml@lancaironl= ine.net
> Subject: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail


>
> Well said, Bill Rumburg!!!=A0 D= on=92t mess up a good thing.=A0
>
> =A0
>
> Pete Fi= eld
>
> 320, Small Ta...

--001636284266a340bb048a7c5ff1--