X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:06:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from to5email2.gprs.rogers.com ([74.198.8.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.5) with ESMTP id 4193457 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:58:26 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.198.8.2; envelope-from=bbriton@telus.net Received: from [10.198.195.8] by to5email2.gprs.rogers.com (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20100402161402.DCJP1237.to5email2.gprs.rogers.com@[10.198.195.8]> for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:14:02 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <5D1C11FB-D69D-430D-A0E9-D8FE858FF68F@telus.net> From: Barney Britton X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7A400) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7A400) Subject: Re: [LML] GPS reception issue X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 09:57:39 -0600 References: Kieth Do you have any tinting film on your canopy? The gold film that some people use to keep out the heat of the sun also filters GPS signals. Just a thought Barney Britton Sent from my iPhone On Apr 2, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Keith Smith wrote: > The signal reception on my Garmin 420 is really dodgy. We've tested > the unit on a bench and it worked great. We've swapped the antenna, > no change. We swapped the antenna cable, it actually got quite a bit > worse (the old one had intermittent issues, the new one is dodgy, > nearly full time.) > > If I route the cable 'just so', I can make it work fairly well on > the ground with the canopy open, but it tends to go to hell when I > close the canopy. > > If I unscrew and lift the glare shield about 1/2" - 1", the > reception is great. The GPS antenna is attached to the top of the > glare shield on the co-pilot side. > > I'm going to get some help from a shop in debugging this...but it > seems to me that part of the canopy is either causing interference > within the antenna cable, or the antenna itself. > > Has anyone experienced anything like this before? This is in a 360. > > Keith