Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 13:19:40 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-4180888@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=T9ChVNERqvJuMmqTl6FaPCKLjy6Dn90JpNLptnKsDqx7keMwy8X1DC4zKDTnhA1H;
  h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>
References: <list-4180781@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Prop for LNC2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

which hartzell?   The latest scimitar  (e.g. HC-H3YF-2UF/FC7693DF) was at 
least for a brief period faster than MT and Aerocomposites.
The predecessor hartzell was not.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lorn H Olsen" <lorn@dynacomm.us>
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 10:08 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Prop for LNC2


> Whoops!
>
> I meant: Between 5 and 10 kts faster than my Hartzell.
>
> Lorn
>