X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:08:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma02.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.4) with ESMTP id 4180530 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:44:08 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.40; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-ma02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2R3hPAg003356 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:43:25 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.cfb.7517a307 (45276) for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:43:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from magic-d24.mail.aol.com (magic-d24.mail.aol.com [172.19.146.158]) by cia-mc03.mx.aol.com (v127_r1.2) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC036-b0dc4bad7ed92dc; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:43:21 -0400 From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <86c87.43e0c3b4.38ded8d9@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:43:21 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] FAA InFO 10001 on Lancair Aircraft X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_86c87.43e0c3b4.38ded8d9_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.5 sub 155 X-AOL-ORIG-IP: 67.175.242.202 X-AOL-IP: 172.19.146.158 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Sky2high@aol.com --part1_86c87.43e0c3b4.38ded8d9_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The FAA strikes again. Go to: _http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_ safety/info/_ (http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/airline_safety/info/) Click on: "FAA Order 8000.91" (2 pages) to read about the authorization for InFOs. Then return and click on: 'All InFOs" and scroll to the bottom to read the first InFO, 06001 (1 page). Note that these are not like SAFOs and read the part containing "Discussion: An InFO does not burden ..... operators with requirements." Scroll up and notice that 09015 was recalled. 09015 was full of numerical errors that 10001 corrected by not reporting any numbers even though it reached the same conclusions. Scroll to the top for 10001 (2 pages). Note particularly the text in italics: "..... valuable information for operators that should help them meet certain ....... operational requirements with relatively low urgency or impact on safety." OK, all together now - Huh? These are your tax dollars at work. I do feel unburdened and relieved. Grayhawk PS Don't fly too slow y'all. --part1_86c87.43e0c3b4.38ded8d9_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The FAA strikes again.
 
Go to:
 
Click on: "FAA Order 8000.91" (2  pages) to read about=20 the authorization for InFOs.
 
Then return and click on:  'All InFOs" and scroll to the bottom= to=20 read the first InFO, 06001 (1 page).  Note that these are not like SA= FOs=20 and read the part containing 
"Discussion: An InFO does not burden ..... operators= with=20 requirements."
 
Scroll up and notice that 09015 was recalled.  09015 was fu= ll of=20 numerical errors that 10001 corrected by not reporting any numbers even th= ough=20 it reached the same conclusions.
 
Scroll to the top for 10001 (2 pages). 
Note particularly the text in italics:
"..... valuable information for operators that should help them= meet=20 certain ....... operational requirements with relatively low urgency= or=20 impact on safety."
 
OK, all together now - Huh?
 
These are your tax dollars at work.
 
I do feel unburdened and relieved.
 
Grayhawk
 
PS Don't fly too slow y'all.
 
 
--part1_86c87.43e0c3b4.38ded8d9_boundary--