X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:50:33 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.146] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c4) with ESMTP id 4032932 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:48:11 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.146; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (imo-ma04.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.139]) by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nBL3lUrc018853 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:47:30 -0500 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id q.bd7.5f135596 (29672) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:47:29 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:48:44 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Prop and Glide considerations X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1261367324" X-Mailer: AOL 9.5 sub 155 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Sky2high@aol.com -------------------------------1261367324 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Earl, Go to the archives and use "small-tail Lancair stability" as a search argument. I couldn't the original email but Mark Ravinsky's reply covers it. _http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html_ (http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html) Grayhawk In a message dated 12/20/2009 6:38:03 P.M. Central Standard Time, earleschroeder@yahoo.com writes: You wrote (Sky2high): Oh yeah, a 300 series slow-speed flaps-out slip can lead to the nose bobbing up and down. I think the 200 series are similar in design and am looking for pros and cons of slipping these types to loose unwanted altitude. I've not found any comments previously on this subject. If they exist, please point me there. Thanks, Earl Also thanks for you and Bill for fine contributions to this list! (others have also) -------------------------------1261367324 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Earl,

Go to the archives and use "small-tail Lancair stability" as a search= =20 argument. I couldn't the original email but Mark Ravinsky's reply co= vers=20 it.

http://mail.= lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

Grayhawk

In a message dated 12/20/2009 6:38:03 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 earleschroeder@yahoo.com writes:

You wrote (Sky2high): Oh yeah, a 300 series slow-speed flaps-out= slip can=20 lead to the nose bobbing up and down.

I= think=20 the 200 series are similar in design and am looking for pros and= cons of=20 slipping these types to loose unwanted altitude.

I've not= found=20 any comments previously on this subject. If they exist, plea= se=20 point me there.

Thanks, Earl

Also thanks for you and= Bill=20 for fine contributions to this list! (others have=20 also)

-------------------------------1261367324--