X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:38:19 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s10.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.85] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c4) with ESMTP id 4032693 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:28:12 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.85; envelope-from=randystuart@hotmail.com Received: from BLU0-SMTP27 ([65.55.116.73]) by blu0-omc3-s10.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:27:36 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [99.163.183.180] X-Originating-Email: [randystuart@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: randystuart@hotmail.com Received: from laptop ([99.163.183.180]) by BLU0-SMTP27.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:27:35 -0800 From: "Randy" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Tone on list X-Original-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:27:38 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0051_01CA8199.BA4CDFA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2009 01:27:35.0808 (UTC) FILETIME=[C6976800:01CA81DC] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01CA8199.BA4CDFA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Colyn,=20 I like that everyone has their opinion, it's all about our experience = and knowledge being shared on the LML.=20 But I'm not the one calling people suicidal, or wish them death, blaming = them for insurance rates, forwarding emails to the FAA, etc. I didn't = start this thread. When did that kind of treatment become acceptable = here? I didn't see anyone mention that.=20 When opinions are passed off as facts, that's wrong. When people insult = and threaten others here, that's wrong.=20 I'm not in opposition to anyone chiming in on the posts with thoughts = and opinions, but opinions are not facts.=20 You did not read that I said it was a "great idea" to exceed Vne. I said = that I have and feel safe doing it. And others do on a regular basis. = They must also feel safe or they wouldn't do it.=20 Who ever doesn't want to exceed Vne... Don't.... No one here told you = to.=20 Randy Stuart LNC-2 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Colyn Case at earthlink=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 11:44 PM Subject: [LML] Re: Tone on list I don't think it follows that if none of the few hundred flying = samples provably had Vne failures that therefore it's a great idea. I don't even think that if a few hundred samples were flown to Vne and = didn't fail that therefore it's a great idea to exceed. You want to be entitled to your opinion but you seem to want even more = badly not to allow others to have theirs. ------=_NextPart_000_0051_01CA8199.BA4CDFA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Colyn,=20
I like that = everyone has their=20 opinion, it's all about our experience and knowledge being shared on the = LML.=20
But I'm not the = one calling=20 people suicidal, or wish them death, blaming them for insurance rates,=20 forwarding emails to the FAA, etc. I didn't start this thread. When did = that=20 kind of treatment become acceptable here? I didn't see anyone = mention that.=20
When opinions are passed off as facts, that's wrong. When = people=20 insult and threaten others here, that's wrong.
I'm not in opposition to anyone chiming in on the posts with = thoughts and=20 opinions, but opinions are not facts.
You did not read that I said it was a "great idea" to exceed Vne. I = said=20 that I have and feel safe doing it. And others do on a regular basis. = They must=20 also feel safe or they wouldn't do it.
Who ever doesn't want to exceed Vne... Don't.... No one here told = you to.=20
 
Randy Stuart
LNC-2
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Colyn=20 Case at earthlink
Sent: Saturday, December 19, = 2009 11:44=20 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Tone on = list

I don't think it follows that if none = of=20 the few hundred flying samples provably had Vne = failures=20 that therefore it's a great idea.
I don't even think that if a few = hundred samples=20 were flown to Vne and didn't fail that therefore it's a great idea to=20 exceed.
You want to be entitled to your = opinion but you=20 seem to want even more badly not to allow others to have = theirs.
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0051_01CA8199.BA4CDFA0--