And now with the data
of hot/cold side temperatures for intumescents, I may have to go back to the
stainless/fiberfrax as the preferred combination although I don’t have any
data on that at all.
It may be I have to
put an intumescent coating on top of the stainless/fiberfrax original or
under those. My firewall is glass/plywood/glass so it might not be as scary
as softening honeycomb. Yeah, I think I’ll believe that so I can move
forward. Feel much better now.
Jim
From:
Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of mikeeasley
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 9:52
AM
To:
lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Intumescent firwall
coating
It seems that the firewall
blanket has to serve two purposes, one to keep the fire from penetrating the
firewall, and two to keep the heat from softening the firewall. If I
read the chart correctly, you would start softening the firewall at about
500F in the engine compartment, since the 3M material cuts the temp in about
half.
In a message dated 12/18/09 08:19:52 Mountain
Standard Time, colyncase@earthlink.net writes:
Here's a document of the sort
I was hoping to find for the intumescent paint.
It shows hot face vs. cold
face temperature.
Based on the original, it
seems to me that is the worry. e.g. the firewall gets soft
somewhere above 250.