X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:34:34 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s31.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.106] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c4) with ESMTP id 4031971 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:11:54 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.106; envelope-from=sltroutman@hotmail.com Received: from BLU0-SMTP19 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s31.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:11:16 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [98.22.71.36] X-Originating-Email: [sltroutman@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: sltroutman@hotmail.com Received: from YOUR99B2A1C14F ([98.22.71.36]) by BLU0-SMTP19.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:11:16 -0800 From: "Shaun Troutman" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Tone on list X-Original-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:11:18 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01CA814C.022F91D0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5843 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2009 14:11:16.0460 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B6A4AC0:01CA817E] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CA814C.022F91D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It would seem to me that the maneuvering speed would be more of a = concern than VNE but no mention of it yet. I bet that most have exceeded = Va and never thought twice about it ??=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: farnsworth=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 6:51 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Tone on list =20 =20 "On August 09, 2005 N750F, a Lancair IV-P disintegrated in flight in a = dive at Mach 0.62. It is not in your list as it happened in Canada = (Transport Canada Report A05W0160). In June of 2003 N29ME, a Lancair IV-P, disintegrated in flight after = exceeding 253KTAS (274KIAS). (NTSB Report ATL03LA094)" It appears that both accident aircraft were being flow in = thunderstorms at the time they disintegrated. Do you suppose that the turbulence associated with thunderstorms may = have been a factor in these in-flight breakups? Just wondering. =20 Lynn Farnsworth ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CA814C.022F91D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It would seem to me that the = maneuvering speed=20 would be more of a concern than VNE but no mention of it yet. I bet that = most=20 have exceeded Va and never thought twice about it ??
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 farnsworth
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 = 6:51=20 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Tone on = list

 

 


=93On August = 09, 2005 N750F,=20 a Lancair IV-P disintegrated in flight in a dive at Mach 0.62. It is = not in=20 your list as it happened in Canada (Transport Canada = Report=20 A05W0160).

In June of 2003 N29ME, a Lancair IV-P, disintegrated = in=20 flight after exceeding 253KTAS (274KIAS). (NTSB Report = ATL03LA094)=94

It appears that both accident = aircraft=20 were being flow in thunderstorms at the time they=20 disintegrated.

Do you=20 suppose that the turbulence associated with thunderstorms may have = been a=20 factor in these in-flight breakups?

Just=20 wondering.

 

Lynn=20 = Farnsworth

------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CA814C.022F91D0--