Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:34:34 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-4032544@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.130.116.53; envelope-from=hwasti@lm50.com
From: Hamid Wasti <hwasti@lm50.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Tone on list
References: <list-4031712@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4031712@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Colyn Case at earthlink wrote:
> I don't think it follows that if none of the few hundred flying 
> samples provably had Vne failures....
That, unfortunately, is a sad reflection on the contemporary state of 
discourse: If you do not like the facts, shout loudly, frequently and 
forcefully till your delusions are accepted as fact.

Clearly, Randy's loud shouting is having the desired effect and people 
are making posts, incorrectly accepting it as a fact that there have 
been no documented Vne failures in Lancairs. The shouting has drowned 
out the calmly written posts by Scott and Jeff where they have pointed 
out the Ainsworth crash in Canada (including the link to the full 
report) where a IV-P disintegrated in a powered dive past Vne.

I agree with everything else Colyn wrote in his post.

Regards,

Hamid