X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:02:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from sfa.gami.com ([68.89.254.162] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 4022995 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:33:36 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.89.254.162; envelope-from=gwbraly@gami.com Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sfa.gami.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF81E8F8; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:33:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from gamimail1.Gami.local (mail.gami.com [10.10.10.33]) by sfa.gami.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A05C7D9; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:33:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from gamimail1.Gami.local ([10.10.12.14]) by gamimail1.Gami.local ([10.10.12.14]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:33:03 -0600 From: George Braly X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:33:01 -0600 Subject: RE: [LML] Re: io-550 vs. tsio-550 differences? Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: io-550 vs. tsio-550 differences? Thread-Index: Acp9jILKH1TBMsSjSveYnLksBwtrPwAcoLkg X-Original-Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) (Debian) at gami.com Ah... you could buy a TN IO-550 engine and have exactly what you want. It already has all of that stuff you are worried about. Intercoolers, fuel pump, throttle, GAMIjector(R) fuel injectors, pressurize= d magnetos, and all the little details. There are over 900 of them flying, and parts support is superb (ask me how = I know).=20 They have better intercooler efficiencies than the TCM TSIO-550.=20 They run on significantly less fuel than TCM TSIO-550s at the same BHp. They run cooler than a TCM TSIO-550 at the same BHp. They can be made to run at VERY high horsepower (Sport Class winning BHp le= vels at Reno if you find someone who really understands the engines and kno= ws how to get them set up right for that demanding activity.) And they are able to use an electronic waste gate controller designed for t= hat engine. There is a pending STC application with the FAA to authorize their use on c= ertified aircraft with G100UL fuel. I know where one complete engine and turbo system is sitting, ready to be i= nstalled. . . . Just a thought. -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Rick= Titsworth Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 7:41 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: io-550 vs. tsio-550 differences? Subtle item, but the sniffle value is also different. Also obvious, but not mentioned, the intercoolers and associated plumbing. I can't imaging buying all the individual turbo items at TCM spare part costs would be any advantage. For example, the small sniffle value alone i= s $1,000. You'll also need a strategy/approach on the sonic nozzles. Popular opinion is that they are needed (required) for the waste gate to function properly (dynamic response issue) and/or to prevent turbo stalls. However, that means you're likely just bleeding some pressurized (boosted) air overboard, which is essentially wasted fuel economy. =20 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Matt losangeles Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 10:52 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] io-550 vs. tsio-550 differences? Does anybody know the differences between the io-550 vs the tsio-550? So far this is what I have determined: io-550 8.5 compression vs tsio-550 7.5 compression different fuel pump on tsio with aneroid and a reference port different injectors with reference ports on tsio tsio has a scavange pump lines and turbos. different exhaust obviously tsio has wastegate and fancy expensive stuff to control it tsio has a different throttle body part# The reason I ask is I am trying to create a turbo normalized io-550 and I a= m not sure if I should get an io-550 core and add the tsio fuel pump, injectors, scavange pump and turbos. I could also get a tsio-550 core and put different pistons/cylinders on it. I suspect the cylinders are the same and the pistons are the only difference. I also talked with Continental about this and supposedly the throttle body is different between the two but they could not say why. Only that they had different part#'s. They did say that something as simple as a 45 vs. a 90 degree fitting or different color paint can cause a different part# with their stuff so there is a chance that the throttle body on the two is mechanically the same. I was wondering if anyone knew the differences between the two. Also, which core would likely be the better to get, io-550 or the tsio-550. This engine is going on a Legacy so I am comparing the io-550G or N vs. the tsio-550c. Thanks for any info you might have on this. Matt =20 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html