X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:12:15 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [69.146.254.20] (HELO crmtest.arilabs.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 4011594 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:34:05 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.146.254.20; envelope-from=kevin@arilabs.net Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CA7880.BB6059A2" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Vne discussion X-Original-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:33:23 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 X-Original-Message-ID: <3E1C96B95693C640B0AC2F59D2500F3B049ED7@crmtest.arilabs.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Vne discussion Thread-Index: Acp4ffgjvNwssfjjQwiBEagFxYFizgAAjrxw From: "Kevin Stallard" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA7880.BB6059A2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think when Peter gets done with his, it's gonna be around mach 2 (give or take)=20 =20 Kevin ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Douglas Brunner Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 8:14 PM To: lml Subject: [LML] Re: Vne discussion =20 Any idea of the Maximum Mach for a Legacy? -----Original Message-----=20 From: Frederick Moreno=20 Sent: Dec 8, 2009 11:16 AM=20 To: lml=20 Subject: [LML] Vne discussion=20 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ------_=_NextPart_001_01CA7880.BB6059A2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think when Peter gets done with = his, it’s gonna be around mach 2 (give or take)

 

Kevin


From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Douglas Brunner
Sent: Tuesday, December = 08, 2009 8:14 PM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: Vne = discussion

 

Any idea of the Maximum Mach for a Legacy?

-----Original Message-----
From: Frederick Moreno
Sent: Dec 8, 2009 11:16 AM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Vne discussion


“Can someone give the = criteria and procedure that is used to derive a Vne speed = ?”

 

There are lots of issues = affecting Vne as noted in previous posts.

 

But as I recall there is one = test requirement for FAR 23 certified aircraft:  Whatever the = manufacturer sets for Vne ( which setting could arise from many = factors), the aircraft must be flight tested to 1.1 times Vne (sometimes = called Vd for dive speed) successfully before it can be = certificated. 

 

So an aircraft may be able to = fly, say, 1.2 times Vne before something terrible happens, but only the = territory up to 1.1 times Vne is explored in the certification = test.   

 

Thus flying beyond this speed = would suggest serious test flying as you are well and truly in = unexplored territory, and best have helmet and parachute on.  =

 

Whether or not a stick or = rudder rap is required at 1.1 times Vne, I do not know.  Perhaps = someone closer to the current version of FAR 23 can confirm or deny this = requirement.  In any event, a stick rap at 1.1 times Vne would be = require lots of preparation and some enlarged cojones.  Not = recommended.

 

When Brent Regan and I were = racing his Lancair IV Denver to Oshkosh (1996, 97 as I recall), the = descent profile was Mach limited initially starting at 27,000 feet using = a hard limit of Mach 0.58.  This was chosen because the factory = aircraft was test flown to Mach 0.6 and we did not want to enter the = unknown.  This Mach number (I had to compute it in those early days = – no Mach displays then) was held until the IAS built to Vne (274 = knots IAS) and this IAS was held to the bottom of descent, all occurring = at 90-100% power. The  maximum cruise speed at 27,000 was about 320 = knots TAS (corrected for temperature and compressibility effects) and = Mach 0.52. As I recall, it only required 200-300 feet per minute initial = descent at the high power setting to drive the Mach number up to 0.58, = so the descent started out very flat, and the built up as the air got = thicker.  I think we hit Vne at about 12-14,000 feet and the = maximum descent rate near the bottom of descent was off scale on the = VSI.  It sounded quite different from cruise and caused the hair on = the back of the neck to stand up a bit particularly since much of the = descent was in IMC. 

 

Key point for you IVP guys: = It does not take much nose down high altitudes and high power settings = to push you up to Mmo, the maximum allowable Mach number.

 

Y’all be careful out = there.

 

Fred

 

--

For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
------_=_NextPart_001_01CA7880.BB6059A2--