X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 11:16:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-bw0-f226.google.com ([209.85.218.226] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 4010594 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:03:28 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.218.226; envelope-from=keith.smith@gmail.com Received: by bwz26 with SMTP id 26so4649760bwz.27 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:02:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jCwvrEqWU069D/ak8YgxzlG2nxnUWj8jZNiYOuUDX9duWnpqEaVXdKlbEOfTGga5Af h8VckyjEIEbM+BpNtWJkQE5fZ0KinNbxxCv/siXlQouzdcGqn5fkeSKZxeBVuuigptKZ T3TGzMulOzQ4V7V48sxt3SGCzlDNc1WTMA/44= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr164483muq.56.1260284571603; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:02:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:02:51 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <705847490912080702g2ad56c5btf55c264d434d4da0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Re: basic aerobatics in a 360 From: Keith Smith X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks Randy, and others who replied on/off list. Most everyone agreed that the airframe won't be the limiting factor. Opinions varied on negative G from "never", to "briefly", to "for a lycoming, as long as you want," but most fell under the 'briefly' category, which is backed up by the POH. The POH confirms that -1G is expected during an aileron roll. > Over 60 degs banks require a parachute. Only for carrying passengers, if my recollection of the regs is correct. If you're flying solo, I don't believe it's mandatory. > Keep all loose objects secure. > Always do aerobatics in designated areas. That's an important point. I scoped out a few areas on the sectional. It's not easy to find an area > 4nm from an airway around northern NJ, but I eventually found a few :) One of the most important revelations that came out of this was a point regarding the attitude indicator. I had been told years ago (but had since forgotten, until I was reminded by a CFI on this list) that it was not a terrific idea, long term, to do aerobatics in an aircraft that is regularly flown under IFR. A steam-driven attitude indicator (which I have) takes somewhat of a beating when > 60degs are exceeded. As it happens, mine is going to be overhauled this week, so I might take the opportunity to do a couple of rolls before then, but after that, that might be the end of it for me since I primarily fly the airplane IFR. So, overall, there wasn't complete consensus on the negative G issue, but most ppl (and the POH) think -1G its ok for brief stints (a la, an aileron roll or briefly during a cuban 8), but as it turns out, I will probably curtail all aerobatic activity to save my beloved AI. I'll have a chat with the mechanic to confirm later today. Thanks for the replies as always. Keith