Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #53662
From: Skip Slater <skipslater@verizon.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number
Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 02:01:32 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Lynn,
   My only objection here is the cavalier disregard for limitations.  Your plane is an exception in that it was specifically modified to race, as was Greenameyer's and the IV that Lancair raced in the early Sport Class races in Reno (at least the engine was).  Your mods make your plane safe to fly at those speeds and you have established a higher Vne that you respect.  That's the smart way to do it.  The vast majority of the Lancairs flying don't have the airframe mods you have and their pilots, if they choose to fly past redline IAS, have nothing upon which to base their own limiting airspeed.  I hope you're not suggesting that they're all as safe to fly as fast as you do.
   If our entire community decides that limitations are just guidelines which can be ignored, we deserve all the bad press we've been getting.  If you ignore Vne, why not ignore an RMP limit, G limit or any other limitation you find too restrictive?  It's an attitude we shouldn't be fostering, particularly in a public forum such as the LML.
  If Joe B. thinks Lancair Vne's are too low, why doesn't he raise them?  If the factory endorses the raising of limits based upon their own research and flight testing, I have no problem with that.  However if you, Randy or any other Lancair drivers right up to Joe instead advocate the disregard of the current published limitations, I personally think that's an unwise choice.  I've been a professional pilot since I left college and I wasn't trained to think that way and strongly discourage the practice.
   Why don't we just leave it at that.
   Regards,
   Skip 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster