X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:28:30 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc4-s30.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.111.169] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 4002430 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:16:05 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.111.169; envelope-from=gt_phantom@hotmail.com Received: from BLU0-SMTP4 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s30.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:15:29 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [68.158.188.243] X-Originating-Email: [gt_phantom@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: gt_phantom@hotmail.com Received: from [192.168.1.67] ([68.158.188.243]) by BLU0-SMTP4.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:15:28 -0800 X-Original-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:15:33 -0500 From: GT Phantom Reply-To: gt_phantom@hotmail.com Organization: None User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Michel Collet , Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: Ivoprop References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2009 17:15:29.0006 (UTC) FILETIME=[60A2F8E0:01CA7505] Hi Michel, The Ivoprop is NOT an aircraft suitable propeller. There were numerous in-flight failures and I believe that the company stopped marketing to flyers. Basically, the blade root is clamped into the hub, and either the clamp slips or the root shatters. It has an interesting history - if I remember, this was the guy who built an ultralight to escape the Eastern Block during the cold war. But don't trust my memory on such things. Best regards, Bill Reister Michel Collet wrote: >
Hello, > What about an Ivoprop (in-flight 2 blade prop) propeller for a Lancair > 320? > Has one of you experience with such a prop? > Thanks in advance > > >
>