X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:24:08 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.39] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 4002216 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:47:46 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.39; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-ma01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nB4ElA6Q002634 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:47:10 -0500 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id q.bef.571d89d6 (45073) for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:47:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com [205.188.84.131]) by cia-mc02.mx.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC025-d4064b1920e722d; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:47:08 -0500 Received: from webmail-d041 (webmail-d041.sim.aol.com [205.188.181.84]) by smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDD032-d4064b1920e722d; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:47:03 -0500 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number X-Original-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:47:03 -0500 X-AOL-IP: 75.46.205.203 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CC4307C72CAB94_4A0C_90A7_webmail-d041.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 29644-STANDARD Received: from 75.46.205.203 by webmail-d041.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.84) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:47:03 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CC4307C723260C-4A0C-479E@webmail-d041.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: VTAILJEFF@aol.com ----------MB_8CC4307C72CAB94_4A0C_90A7_webmail-d041.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Actually, we are not "test pilots". We are pilots who fly amatuer built ai= rcraft.=20 Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Randy To: lml Sent: Fri, Dec 4, 2009 5:19 am Subject: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number I will agree with your statement that we are "Test pilots". But as an expe= rimental aircraft pilot we are ALL considered test pilots. The experimenta= l certification is: Every flight is a test flight. That's why we perform= a "Conditional use" every annual. That's why we aren't constrained to PMA= 's TSO's STC's 8130, etc. as certified aircraft are.=20 Ok, I admit it.... I'm a test pilot.... And proud of it.=20 =20 Randy Stuart LNC-2 "Test Pilot" ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Skip Slater=20 To: lml=20 Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:21 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number "One IVP was lost years ago when it exceeded Vne." =20 Gene Long's ES also broke up in flight when it exceeded VNE during it's in= explicable descent from cruse altitude a year an a half ago. =20 The fact it this: No amount of pilot skill will save a plane once flutter= begins to break it apart. If you knowingly exceed VNE, you are a test pi= lot and the only way you'll know you went too fast is as your plane is goi= ng down in pieces. Pilots who willfully ignore manufacturer established= limitations are accidents looking for a place to happen. Pilots who brag= about such exploits deserve a very wide berth. =20 I have to wonder what the instructors from HIPAT and LOBO would have to sa= y on this subject. If they're listening, I hope they'll chime in. =20 Skip Slater=20 =20 =20 ----------MB_8CC4307C72CAB94_4A0C_90A7_webmail-d041.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Actually, we are not "test pilots". We are pilots who fly amatuer bui= lt aircraft.
 
Jeff
 



 
-----Orig= inal Message-----
From: Randy <randystuart@hotmail.com>
To: lml
Sent: Fri, Dec 4, 2009 5:19 am
Subject: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number

I will agree wi= th your statement that we are "Test pilots". But as an experimental aircra= ft pilot we are ALL considered test pilots. The experimental certification= is: Every flight is a test flight. That's why we perform a "Conditional= use" every annual. That's why we aren't constrained to PMA's TSO's STC's= 8130, etc. as certified aircraft are.
Ok, I admit it....= I'm a test pilot.... And proud of it.
 
Randy Stuart<= /EM>
LNC-2
"Test Pilot"<= /EM>
----- Original Message -----
To: lml
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009= 3:21 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a mea= ningless number

"One IVP was lost years ago when it excee= ded Vne."
 
Gene Long's ES also broke up in flight wh= en it exceeded VNE during it's inexplicable descent from cruse altitude a= year an a half ago.
 
The fact it this:  No amount of pilo= t skill will save a plane once flutter begins to break it apart.  If= you knowingly exceed VNE, you are a test pilot and the only way you'll kn= ow you went too fast is as your plane is going down in pieces.  Pilot= s who willfully ignore manufacturer established limitations are accidents= looking for a place to happen.  Pilots who brag about such exploits= deserve a very wide berth.
 
I have to wonder what the instructors fro= m HIPAT and LOBO would have to say on this subject.  If they're liste= ning, I hope they'll chime in.
 
Skip Slater 
 
 
----------MB_8CC4307C72CAB94_4A0C_90A7_webmail-d041.sysops.aol.com--