X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:37:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.146] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTP id 3998534 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:31:46 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.146; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nB22V59T022064 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:31:05 -0500 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id q.d3c.4b1363e4 (44631) for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:31:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-da02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.145]) by cia-mc01.mx.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC014-5bb44b15d1603df; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:31:00 -0500 Received: from webmail-stg-m05 (webmail-stg-m05.sim.aol.com [64.12.222.104]) by smtprly-da02.mx.aol.com (v127.6) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDA023-5bb44b15d1603df; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:30:56 -0500 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Vne is NOT a meaningless number X-Original-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:30:55 -0500 X-AOL-IP: 24.107.70.141 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CC410E9C428140_3838_129C1_webmail-stg-m05.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 29644-STANDARD Received: from 24.107.70.141 by webmail-stg-m05.sysops.aol.com (64.12.222.104) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:30:55 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CC410E9C369A65-3838-9376@webmail-stg-m05.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: VTAILJEFF@aol.com ----------MB_8CC410E9C428140_3838_129C1_webmail-stg-m05.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The real question everyone should ask is: "how does a manufacturer establi= sh Vne?" Rob Wolfe a respected aeronautical engineer or Pete Field or Ru= dy Haug (real test pilots) can chime in here and describe how it is done= and what the consequences of ignoring it are. One IVP was lost years ago= when it exceeded Vne. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Craig Berland To: lml Sent: Tue, Dec 1, 2009 7:47 pm Subject: [LML] Vne is NOT a meaningless number Bill, =20 Advertised true cruise speed in the IV-P is well above Vne so this can=E2= =80=99t be true for a lot of airplanes. I believe Vne is a subjective num= ber as I have never heard of any airframe manufacturer diving a plane to= a speed it self-destructs. However, I also respect Vne. =20 Craig Berland IV-P N7VG =20 Van of Van's Aircraft wrote about VNE a couple of years ago. Much to my su= rprise, VNE is true airspeed, not indicated. It's pretty easy to exceed in= my Lancair. Results can be explosive, meaning onset of flutter to compone= nt failure can be nearly instantaneous. I can't wear a parachute in my pla= ne (Lancair 320), so I wouldn't screw around with it. Bill Kennedy ----------MB_8CC410E9C428140_3838_129C1_webmail-stg-m05.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
The real question everyone should ask is: "how does a manufacturer&nb= sp;establish Vne?"  Rob Wolfe a respected aeronautical engineer or &n= bsp;Pete Field or Rudy Haug (real test pilots) can chime in here and descr= ibe how it is done and what the consequences of ignoring it are. One IVP= was lost years ago when it exceeded Vne.
 
Jeff

-----Orig= inal Message-----
From: Craig Berland <cberland@systems3.net>
To: lml
Sent: Tue, Dec 1, 2009 7:47 pm
Subject: [LML] Vne is NOT a meaningless number

Bill,
 
Advertised true cruise speed in the IV-P is well above Vn= e so this can=E2=80=99t be true for a lot of airplanes.  I believe Vn= e is a subjective number as I have never heard of any airframe manufacture= r diving a plane to a speed  it self-destructs.  However, I also= respect Vne.
 
Craig Berland
IV-P  N7VG
 
Van of Van's Aircraft wrote about VNE a couple of years= ago. Much to my surprise, VNE is true airspeed, not indicated. It's prett= y easy to exceed in my Lancair. Results can be explosive, meaning onset of= flutter to component failure can be nearly instantaneous. I can't wear a= parachute in my plane (Lancair 320), so I wouldn't screw around with it.<= SPAN style=3D"COLOR: #1f497d"> Bill Kennedy

----------MB_8CC410E9C428140_3838_129C1_webmail-stg-m05.sysops.aol.com--