Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #53593
From: Dominic V. Crain <domcrain@tpg.com.au>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:51:23 -0500
To: <lml>

G’day Bill,

So Van, of Van’s is saying that when I was flogging along in my B727 and Airbus at 470 KTAS each of which had a VMO of 350 KIAS I was exceeding Vne?

Don’t think so.

Cheers

Dom

VH-CZJ

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Kennedy
Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 10:29 PM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number

 

Van of Van's Aircraft wrote about VNE a couple of years ago. Much to my surprise, VNE is true airspeed, not indicated. It's pretty easy to exceed in my Lancair. Results can be explosive, meaning onset of flutter to component failure can be nearly instantaneous. I can't wear a parachute in my plane (Lancair 320), so I wouldn't screw around with it.

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster