X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:51:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail15.tpgi.com.au ([203.12.160.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTPS id 3998115 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:23:02 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.12.160.61; envelope-from=domcrain@tpg.com.au X-TPG-Junk-Status: Message not scanned X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed X-TPG-Abuse: host=60-241-193-89.static.tpgi.com.au; ip=60.241.193.89; date=Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:22:23 +1100 Received: from DomandJanPC (60-241-193-89.static.tpgi.com.au [60.241.193.89]) by mail15.tpgi.com.au (envelope-from domcrain@tpg.com.au) (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB1LMLtD029022 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:22:23 +1100 From: "Dominic V. Crain" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number X-Original-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:21:47 +1100 X-Original-Message-ID: <006201ca72cc$4b5580b0$e2008210$@com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0063_01CA7328.7EC5F8B0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcpyeY1BZXXl8j45SDaZMPN/+tWt1AAUeCuw Content-Language: en-au This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01CA7328.7EC5F8B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit G'day Bill, So Van, of Van's is saying that when I was flogging along in my B727 and Airbus at 470 KTAS each of which had a VMO of 350 KIAS I was exceeding Vne? Don't think so. Cheers Dom VH-CZJ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Kennedy Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 10:29 PM To: lml Subject: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number Van of Van's Aircraft wrote about VNE a couple of years ago. Much to my surprise, VNE is true airspeed, not indicated. It's pretty easy to exceed in my Lancair. Results can be explosive, meaning onset of flutter to component failure can be nearly instantaneous. I can't wear a parachute in my plane (Lancair 320), so I wouldn't screw around with it. ------=_NextPart_000_0063_01CA7328.7EC5F8B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

G’day Bill,

So Van, of Van’s is saying that when I was flogging along in my B727 = and Airbus at 470 KTAS each of which had a VMO of 350 KIAS I was exceeding = Vne?

Don’t think so.

Cheers

Dom=

VH-CZJ

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bill Kennedy
Sent: Tuesday, 1 December 2009 10:29 PM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless = number

 

Van of Van's Aircraft wrote about VNE a couple of years ago. Much to my = surprise, VNE is true airspeed, not indicated. It's pretty easy to exceed in my = Lancair. Results can be explosive, meaning onset of flutter to component failure = can be nearly instantaneous. I can't wear a parachute in my plane (Lancair = 320), so I wouldn't screw around with it.

------=_NextPart_000_0063_01CA7328.7EC5F8B0--