X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:47:56 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-3998354@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <WeinsweigD@tsnci.com>
Received: from mail.tsnci.com ([65.78.205.250] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3)
  with ESMTP id 3997434 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:39:16 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.78.205.250; envelope-from=WeinsweigD@tsnci.com
Received: from TSNC_DOM-MTA by mail.tsnci.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:44:44 -0500
X-Original-Message-Id: <sb14e58c.054@mail.tsnci.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.7 
X-Original-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 09:44:05 -0500
From: "Dr. Weinsweig" <WeinsweigD@tsnci.com>
X-Original-To: <bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com>,<lml@lancaironline.net>,
	<lml@tsnci.com>
Subject: [LML] Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

as i recall(i'll have to look it up again) but vne is 274 kts in a ivp. 
if this is the case then it must be indicated not true otherwise i as
would most iv and propjet drivers exceed vne in cruise at 300+ ktas at
altitude with indicated around 200.  am i missing something?

david weinsweig
n750dw propjet(still for sale)
304-633-5221
weinsweigd@gmail.com