X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:20:32 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c2) with ESMTPS id 3987111 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:28:11 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net Received: from john-study-2.perigee.net (dsl-208-26-41-122.perigee.net [208.26.41.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.perigee.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id nANNRat2030636 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:27:37 -0500 X-Original-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:27:33 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Fuel Pressure question From: "John Schroeder" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.64 (Win32) Dan - Have they set up the fuel injection system according to the SID97-3D (Fuel Injection System) that Continental publishes? They have charts for altitude and temperature compensation, as well as the correct tools and hookups. This should be done at each annual and before the first flight. On our ES, we mounted the fuel pressure transducer on the firewall, next to the oil pressure transducer. No problems with flying into and out of Ely, NV this past month ( Pattern was 7100 ft.). Hope this helps, John On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:08:03 -0500, Dan Ballin wrote: > A few questions have come up regarding fuel pressure while flight testing > Ralph Love's Legacy, N122PT. It has an IO-550 with MT prop. We've had > indications of high fuel pressure when the throttle is retarded (38-40 > psi) > in the pattern which is accompanied by engine roughness. All gets better > when the mixture is leaned. Testing has been done in Redmond - so > patterns > about 4-5000 ft. So is this "normal" and just explained by the overly > rich > state due to altitude and leaning is the solution or is something else > going > on? Where should the fuel pressure be measured from? The unmetered > side of > the fuel metering unit or the metered side? and why. And lastly, > where > have you mounted the fuel pressure transducer? EI suggests the firewall, > but that leads to a long fuel line and ? does that make any difference in > the readings, dampening etc. Can you mount it closer or are the > vibrations > going to cause failure of the fitting and fuel leaking over hot > cylinders? > > Any thoughts or comments will be appreciated. > > Thanks > > Dan Ballin > LEG2 #286