X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:40:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3865331 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:27:09 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=q8+QsISxao7pcjogZdpFyfT3MG/yaxEVMs0hfDIFn1aBMfrJMCRcioJlDMbg8pk5; h=Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Thread-index:X-MIMEOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.173.71.128] (helo=DELL8300) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mr1S7-0004w4-B1 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:26:35 -0400 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: Pump vs. Scale for Epoxy mixing X-Original-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:26:51 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007B_01CA3D66.1D4218F0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-index: Aco9hPba8CkZ7vWrQSelC1Cx1UJyJgACwTBw X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c2609d0a409a2fb15f1acd5fb98b49dfb53842601a10902912494350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.173.71.128 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_007B_01CA3D66.1D4218F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Scale hands down. Jim _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of WILLIAM HOLDEN Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:07 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Pump vs. Scale for Epoxy mixing What are everyone's thoughts on using a pump versus a scale for epoxy mixing? I have a pump that I bought used and can't seem to get it working smoothly despite a lot of cleaning. Seems to me a scale and cups are easier to keep clean and monitor rather than the pump? Any thoughts? Will ------=_NextPart_000_007B_01CA3D66.1D4218F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Scale hands down.

Jim

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of WILLIAM HOLDEN
Sent: Thursday, September = 24, 2009 9:07 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Pump vs. = Scale for Epoxy mixing

What are everyone's thoughts on using a pump versus a = scale for epoxy mixing? I have a pump that I bought used and can't seem = to get it working smoothly despite a lot of cleaning. Seems to me a scale = and cups are easier to keep clean and monitor rather than the pump? = Any thoughts?

Will

------=_NextPart_000_007B_01CA3D66.1D4218F0--