X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:45:57 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-out2.fuse.net ([216.68.8.171] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3685488 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:10:43 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.68.8.171; envelope-from=dreagan@fuse.net X-Original-Return-Path: X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=pOfvU1qiAAAA:8 a=Th07CCDOFDzWRH8kdroA:9 a=3NifLQN2PqxDJp9NGeUzxi1EnvAA:4 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=T7dl6hF01GMA:10 a=CjxXgO3LAAAA:8 a=4sLtNb3LyHQ8LExRQr4A:9 a=vuBx8cLWLBzvZcsf_iIA:7 a=E3cvWuoozkWIE4c0o1w7bbjAUwUA:4 a=rC2wZJ5BpNYA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: gwout2 smtp.mail=dreagan@fuse.net; spf=unknown Received-SPF: error (gwout2: 208.102.196.40 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of fuse.net Received: from [208.102.196.40] ([208.102.196.40:50071] helo=D45LWMF1) by gwout2 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.37 r(28805/28810M)) with ESMTP id 6E/F3-09581-049F83A4; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:10:08 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <004001c9ef55$33aa7ec0$fdc8a8c0@D45LWMF1> From: "Dan Reagan" X-Original-To: , "J H Webb" References: Subject: Re: [LML] L-IV Tires X-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:09:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003D_01C9EF33.AC7EA000" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C9EF33.AC7EA000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The last set of main tires I used were Goodyear Custom III's. You could = see where they just barely touched up in the wheel well. A small amount = of rubber was left from the spinning wheel. I started trying to = remember to brake the tires before retract but then again it's about all = I can do to remember to raise the gear. =20 The last set of Goodyear Custom III's got right at 300 landings. The = previous set before that one did not do as well due to poor alignment. = After realignment they are now wearing evenly. My landings are probably = a little faster than the average so my wear might be a little more. I = think that comes out to somewhere around $1.40 a landing with tubes.=20 I think it is a very good idea to use the "airstop" tubes also. I will = continue using Goodyear Custom III's. Dan Reagan IVP 650 hrs ----- Original Message -----=20 From: J H Webb=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:16 PM Subject: Re: [LML] L-IV Tires Bill, I changed mine from the McCreary to Goodyear Custom III's and to be = safe did a retraction test and everything fit well with satisfactory = clearance, too (in case the spinning tire grows with centrifugal force). = By the way the Goodyears (more expensive) last considerably longer and = makes the actual cost per landing significantly lower. Jack Webb L360, LIV BSAE -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: billhogarty To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 7:06:17 AM Subject: [LML] L-IV Tires Has anyone changed the tires on a L-IV from the original = (Condor/McCreary) without having to enlarge the openings in the = fuselage? If so, what brand and size. Thanks, Bill Hogarty -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C9EF33.AC7EA000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The last set of main tires I used were = Goodyear=20 Custom III's.  You could see where they just barely touched up in = the wheel=20 well.  A small amount of rubber was left from the spinning = wheel.  I=20 started trying to remember to brake the tires before retract but then = again it's=20 about all I can do to remember to raise the gear. 
 
The last set of Goodyear Custom III's = got right at=20 300 landings.  The previous set before that one did not do as well = due to=20 poor alignment.  After realignment they are now wearing = evenly.  My=20 landings are probably a little faster than the average so my wear might = be a=20 little more.  I think that comes out to somewhere around $1.40 a = landing=20 with tubes. 
 
I think it is a very good idea to use = the "airstop"=20 tubes also.  I will continue using Goodyear Custom = III's.
 
Dan Reagan
IVP 650 hrs
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 J H = Webb=20
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 = 7:16=20 PM
Subject: Re: [LML] L-IV = Tires

Bill,

   I changed mine from the McCreary to = Goodyear=20 Custom III's and to be safe did a retraction test and everything fit = well with=20 satisfactory clearance, too (in case the spinning tire grows with = centrifugal=20 force).  By the way the Goodyears (more expensive) last = considerably=20 longer and makes the actual cost per landing significantly = lower.

Jack=20 Webb

L360, LIV
BSAE

From: billhogarty=20 <billhogarty@hughes.net>
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 = 7:06:17=20 AM
Subject: [LML] = L-IV=20 Tires

Has anyone changed the tires on a L-IV from the = original=20 (Condor/McCreary) without having to enlarge the openings in the=20 fuselage?  If so, what brand and size.  Thanks, Bill=20 Hogarty

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html<= /SPAN>
------=_NextPart_000_003D_01C9EF33.AC7EA000--