X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:22:54 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from col0-omc3-s18.col0.hotmail.com ([65.55.34.157] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3670920 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:02:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.34.157; envelope-from=bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Received: from COL108-W55 ([65.55.34.136]) by col0-omc3-s18.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:02:12 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_f6926d2f-3719-47c3-ac0a-36a43189a39a_" X-Originating-IP: [71.111.124.220] From: Bill Kennedy X-Original-To: Subject: RE: [LML] L360 winglets X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:02:12 -0700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2009 00:02:12.0680 (UTC) FILETIME=[B65A1C80:01C9E4A7] --_f6926d2f-3719-47c3-ac0a-36a43189a39a_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had a set=2C but when I asked the factory for performance data=2C they ha= d none -- and knew nothing. That was enough for me -- no extended tips on N= 42BK. I did see some documentation that suggested they might improve high a= ltitude performance=2C but no data. To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed=2C 3 Jun 2009 18:34:32 -0400 From: stevens5@swiftdsl.com.au Subject: [LML] L360 winglets I am building a L360 in Australia=2C and will soon have to make the decision about what wing tips to use. The kit comes with the standard tips. However=2C I have seen some Lancairs with winglets=2C and am wondering whet= her they are worth the investment in time and money. Has anyone out there in LML lan= d done any research into the benefits of winglets? I am interested particular= ly in before and after comparisons=2C both in terms of speed and general handl= ing. =20 Any info would be greatly appreciated. =20 Rob Stevens =20 Perth=2C Western Australia. --_f6926d2f-3719-47c3-ac0a-36a43189a39a_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had a set=2C but when I asked the factory for performance data=2C they ha= d none -- and knew nothing. That was enough for me -- no extended tips on N= 42BK. I did see some documentation that suggested they might improve high a= ltitude performance=2C but no data.

To: lml@= lancaironline.net
Date: Wed=2C 3 Jun 2009 18:34:32 -0400
From: steven= s5@swiftdsl.com.au
Subject: [LML] L360 winglets

I am building a L360 in Australia=2C and will soon have to mak= e the decision about what wing tips to use. The kit comes with the standard tips. However=2C I have seen some Lancairs with winglets=2C and am wondering whet= her they are worth the investment in time and money. Has anyone out there in LML lan= d done any research into the benefits of winglets? I am interested particular= ly in before and after comparisons=2C both in terms of speed and general handl= ing.

 =3B

Any info would be greatly appreciated.

 =3B

Rob Stevens

 =3B

Perth=2C Western Australia.

= --_f6926d2f-3719-47c3-ac0a-36a43189a39a_--